Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GPOR vs CNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
GPOR vs CNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $5.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $594M | $1.18B |
| Gross Margin | 47.8% | 28.7% |
| Operating Margin | 40.2% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 7.0x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $789M | $2.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $779K |
GPOR vs CNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 288.7 | +188.7% |
| CNX Resources Corpo… (CNX) | 100 | 268.4 | +168.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPOR vs CNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPOR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 0.1%
- 147.3% 10Y total return vs CNX's 145.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 43.0%, current ratio 0.68x
CNX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 59.2%, EPS growth 7.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -18.3%
- Beta 0.12, current ratio 0.44x
- 59.2% revenue growth vs GPOR's 42.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.2% revenue growth vs GPOR's 42.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.9% margin vs GPOR's 41.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs GPOR's 0.14 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.3% vs GPOR's -1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs CNX's 17.5%, ROIC 14.8% vs 9.0% |
GPOR vs CNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GPOR vs CNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 1.6x GPOR's $1.4B. CNX is the more profitable business, keeping 50.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPOR's 41.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $884M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $594M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $362M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.8% | +28.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.2% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.9% | +50.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.3% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +127.7% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GPOR and CNX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, GPOR trades at a 9% valuation discount to CNX's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNX's 5.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $7.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.40x | 9.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.02x | 12.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.02x | 5.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 2.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.82x | 9.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $27 for CNX. GPOR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNX's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPOR scores 7/9 vs CNX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.7% | +27.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +19.8% | +17.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.8% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.3% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $787M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $779,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $789M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.16x | 7.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNX five years ago would be worth $26,698 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,735 for GPOR. Over the past 12 months, CNX leads with a +16.3% total return vs GPOR's -1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNX at 33.7% vs GPOR's 25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +0.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.0% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.9% | +138.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.3% | +167.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.3% | +145.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CNX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPOR's 0.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNX currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs GPOR's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $225.78 | $43.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $160.95 | $27.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +83.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 322K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GPOR as "Buy" and CNX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for GPOR (target: $242) vs -1.0% for CNX (target: $36).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $242.00 | $36.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.9% | +10.1% |
GPOR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GPOR vs CNX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPOR or CNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the stronger pick with 59.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 42. 5% for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GPOR or CNX?
On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.
4x versus CNX Resources Corporation at 9. 2x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GPOR or CNX?
Over the past 5 years, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) delivered a total return of +167.
0%, compared to +147. 3% for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPOR returned +147. 3% versus CNX's +145. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GPOR or CNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Gulfport Energy Corporation's 0. 14β — meaning GPOR is approximately 20% more volatile than CNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 57% for CNX Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GPOR or CNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is pulling ahead at 59.
2% versus 42. 5% for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CNX Resources Corporation grew EPS 763. 3% year-over-year, compared to 245. 9% for Gulfport Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPOR leads at -17. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GPOR or CNX?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 29. 6% for CNX Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus 36. 8% for CNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GPOR or CNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for CNX Resources Corporation — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPOR: 34. 1% to $242. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GPOR or CNX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GPOR or CNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), +145. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNX: +145. 5%, GPOR: +147. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GPOR and CNX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.