GPOR vs WMB vs AR vs ET

For growth investors, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the stronger pick with 42.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the cheapest at 8.

3x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 1x. On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) delivered a total return of +236.

4%, compared to +145. 1% for Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +371. 1% versus AR's +44. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

14β versus Antero Resources Corporation's 0. 24β — meaning AR is approximately 68% more volatile than GPOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is pulling ahead at 42.

5% versus -0. 1% for Energy Transfer LP (ET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Antero Resources Corporation grew EPS 1028% year-over-year, compared to 5. 5% for Energy Transfer LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMB leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus 5. 9% for Energy Transfer LP — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus 11. 4% for ET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPOR leads at 70. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.

0x forward P/E versus 31. 2x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 24. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPOR: 35. 3% to $242. 00.

In this comparison, ET (6.

5% yield), WMB (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. GPOR, AR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +371. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +371. 1%, AR: +44. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock. WMB, ET pay a dividend while GPOR, AR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.