Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GRAF logo
GRAF
APO logo
APO
BX logo
BX
KKR logo
KKR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GRAF
Graf Global Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$312M
5Y Perf.-21.9%
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.

Asset Management - Global

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$77.18B
5Y Perf.+168.2%
BX
Blackstone Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$96.22B
5Y Perf.+116.7%
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$85.80B
5Y Perf.+211.7%

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GRAF logoGRAF
APO logoAPO
BX logoBX
KKR logoKKR
IndustryShell CompaniesAsset Management - GlobalAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$312M$77.18B$96.22B$85.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$29.68B$13.83B$19.04B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$2.15B$3.02B$2.37B
Gross Margin89.3%86.0%22.5%
Operating Margin31.1%51.9%12.3%
Forward P/E38.8x15.0x20.9x16.0x
Total Debt$0.00$13.36B$13.31B$54.77B
Cash & Equiv.$699.00$19.24B$2.63B$6M

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GRAF
APO
BX
KKR
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Graf Global Corp. (GRAF)10078.1-21.9%
Apollo Global Manag… (APO)100268.2+168.2%
Blackstone Inc. (BX)100216.7+116.7%
KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR)100311.7+211.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Apollo Global Management, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. GRAF also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇BX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GRAF
Graf Global Corp.
The Banking Pick

GRAF is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 4.0% vs KKR's 0.0%
  • +3.9% vs KKR's -22.6%
Best for: bank quality
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
The Banking Pick

APO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 1.6%
  • 8.7% 10Y total return vs KKR's 6.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 31.4%, current ratio 0.78x
  • PEG 0.20 vs GRAF's 2.34
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BX
Blackstone Inc.
The Banking Pick

BX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.

  • Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
  • Beta 1.45, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.91x
  • 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs APO's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
The Financial Play

KKR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBX logoBX21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
ValueAPO logoAPOLower P/E (15.0x vs 20.9x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.00
Quality / MarginsBX logoBXEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs APO's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyAPO logoAPOBeta 1.25 vs KKR's 1.58, lower leverage
DividendsBX logoBX6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GRAF logoGRAF+3.9% vs KKR's -22.6%
Efficiency (ROA)BX logoBXEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs APO's 0.5%

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GRAFGraf Global Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

APOApollo Global Management, Inc.
FY 2025
Retirement Services Segment
84.4%$27.0B
Asset Management Segment
15.6%$5.0B
BXBlackstone Inc.
FY 2025
Private Equity Segment
77.3%$1.7B
Real Estate Segment
22.7%$490M
KKRKKR & Co. Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Segment
49.3%$11.6B
Asset Management And Strategic Holdings Segments
33.3%$7.8B
Asset Management Segment
17.4%$4.1B

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAPOLAGGINGKKR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

APO and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $29.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. BX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APO's 7.2%.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$29.7B$13.8B$19.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$10.0B$7.2B$9.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$2.1B$3.0B$2.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$393,929$4.4B$3.5B$7.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+89.3%+86.0%+22.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+31.1%+51.9%+12.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.2%+21.8%+12.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.8%+25.1%+39.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-70.1%-5.8%+41.3%-1.7%
BX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

APO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 18.4x trailing earnings, APO trades at a 55% valuation discount to KKR's 41.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APO offers better value at 0.25x vs GRAF's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
Market CapShares × price$312M$77.2B$96.2B$85.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$312M$71.3B$106.9B$140.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS38.79x18.44x31.65x41.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.99x20.85x15.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x0.25x1.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.22x14.82x19.73x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.55x6.96x4.45x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x1.91x4.38x1.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.36x55.14x9.01x
APO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BX delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. APO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KKR's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.5%+5.5%+14.3%+3.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.3%+0.5%+6.5%+0.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.6%+16.0%+16.1%+0.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.8%+8.8%+16.9%+0.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92356
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x0.61x0.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$699-$5.9B$10.7B$54.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$699$19.2B$2.6B$6M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$13.4B$13.3B$54.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense26.54x14.12x3.29x
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APO five years ago would be worth $24,874 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,023 for BX. Over the past 12 months, GRAF leads with a +3.9% total return vs KKR's -22.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APO at 23.8% vs BX's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.9%-8.0%-21.0%-25.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.9%-1.5%-9.3%-22.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+89.6%+50.4%+76.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+148.7%+50.2%+80.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.1%+867.6%+501.2%+682.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+23.8%+14.6%+20.9%
APO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GRAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GRAF is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRAF currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.03x1.25x1.45x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.85$157.28$190.09$153.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.26$99.56$101.73$82.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.6%+85.1%+64.6%+62.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.759.553.948.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded59K3.4M5.0M4.2M
GRAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: APO as "Buy", BX as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.7% upside for KKR (target: $141) vs 14.7% for APO (target: $154). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs KKR's 0.84%.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.APO logoAPOApollo Global Man…BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KKR logoKKRKKR & Co. Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$153.50$156.29$141.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts282927
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+6.3%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises326
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.14$7.70$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.0%+0.3%+0.1%
Evenly matched — BX and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallApollo Global Management, I… (APO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GRAF vs APO vs BX vs KKR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GRAF or APO or BX or KKR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.

(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) offers the better valuation at 18. 4x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

On trailing P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) is the cheapest at 18. 4x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 41. 1x. On forward P/E, Apollo Global Management, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apollo Global Management, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

Over the past 5 years, Apollo Global Management, Inc.

(APO) delivered a total return of +148. 7%, compared to +50. 2% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APO returned +867. 6% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graf Global Corp.

(GRAF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning KKR is approximately -5560% more volatile than GRAF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 67% for KKR & Co. Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.

(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

Blackstone Inc.

(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — APO leads at 88. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GRAF or APO or BX or KKR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) trades at 15. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Blackstone Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 46. 7% to $141. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or APO or BX or KKR?

In this comparison, BX (6.

3% yield), APO (1. 6% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GRAF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GRAF or APO or BX or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Graf Global Corp.

(GRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRAF: +14. 1%, BX: +501. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GRAF and APO and BX and KKR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. APO, BX, KKR pay a dividend while GRAF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.