Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GRAF vs BX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
GRAF vs BX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $312M | $96.22B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $13.83B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $3.02B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 86.0% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 51.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8x | 20.9x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $13.31B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699.00 | $2.63B | $343.34B |
GRAF vs BX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graf Global Corp. (GRAF) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRAF vs BX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRAF is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs JPM's 2.2%
BX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Beta 1.45, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.91x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.52x
- PEG 0.81 vs GRAF's 2.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs JPM's 3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 20.9x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.00 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BX's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs BX's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs BX's -9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BX's 0.3% |
GRAF vs BX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GRAF vs BX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 21.8% (BX) to 20.4% (JPM).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $13.8B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $7.2B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $3.0B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$393,929 | $3.5B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +86.0% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +51.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +21.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +25.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | +41.3% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 59% valuation discount to GRAF's 38.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs GRAF's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $312M | $96.2B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312M | $106.9B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.79x | 31.65x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.85x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.34x | 1.51x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.82x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.96x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 4.38x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.14x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for GRAF. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BX scores 5/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +14.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +6.5% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +16.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +16.9% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.61x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$699 | $10.7B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699 | $2.6B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $13.3B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 14.12x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,023 for BX. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs BX's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs BX's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -21.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -9.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +50.4% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +50.2% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +501.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +14.6% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRAF and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRAF is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BX's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs BX's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 1.45x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $190.09 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.26 | $101.73 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +64.6% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 53.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 5.0M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for BX (target: $156) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $156.29 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.70 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.9% |
BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
GRAF vs BX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRAF or BX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blackstone Inc. (BX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRAF or BX or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Graf Global Corp. at 38. 8x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or BX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +50. 2% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +501. 2% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRAF or BX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning BX is approximately -5119% more volatile than GRAF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRAF or BX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Inc. grew EPS 7. 2% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRAF or BX or JPM?
Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRAF or BX or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for Blackstone Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BX: 27. 3% to $156. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or BX or JPM?
In this comparison, BX (6.
3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. GRAF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRAF or BX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRAF: +14. 1%, BX: +501. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRAF and BX and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. BX, JPM pay a dividend while GRAF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.