Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
GRAF logo
GRAF
BX logo
BX
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GRAF vs BX vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GRAF
Graf Global Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$312M
5Y Perf.-21.9%
BX
Blackstone Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$96.22B
5Y Perf.+116.7%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

GRAF vs BX vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GRAF logoGRAF
BX logoBX
KO logoKO
IndustryShell CompaniesAsset ManagementBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$312M$96.22B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$13.83B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$8M$3.02B$13.70B
Gross Margin86.0%61.7%
Operating Margin51.9%29.3%
Forward P/E38.8x20.9x25.3x
Total Debt$0.00$13.31B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$699.00$2.63B$10.27B

GRAF vs BX vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GRAF
BX
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Graf Global Corp. (GRAF)10078.1-21.9%
Blackstone Inc. (BX)100216.7+116.7%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GRAF vs BX vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇BX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
GRAF
Graf Global Corp.
The Financial Play

GRAF plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: financial services exposure
BX
Blackstone Inc.
The Banking Pick

BX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 6.3%
  • Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
  • 5.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.

  • 27.8% margin vs GRAF's 4.0%
  • +17.2% vs BX's -9.3%
  • 13.1% ROA vs GRAF's 3.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -0.6%
Best for: quality and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBX logoBX21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueBX logoBXLower P/E (20.9x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.00 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs GRAF's 4.0%
Stability / SafetyBX logoBXLower D/E ratio (60.8% vs 132.7%)
DividendsBX logoBX6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)KO logoKO+17.2% vs BX's -9.3%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs GRAF's 3.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -0.6%

GRAF vs BX vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GRAFGraf Global Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

BXBlackstone Inc.
FY 2025
Private Equity Segment
77.3%$1.7B
Real Estate Segment
22.7%$490M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

GRAF vs BX vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBXLAGGINGGRAF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

KO and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BX's 21.8%.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$13.8B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$7.2B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$3.0B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$393,929$3.5B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+86.0%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+51.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.8%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+25.1%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-70.1%+41.3%+18.2%
BX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 27.2x trailing earnings, KO trades at a 30% valuation discount to GRAF's 38.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BX offers better value at 1.51x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$312M$96.2B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$312M$106.9B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS38.79x31.65x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.85x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x1.51x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.82x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.96x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.33x4.38x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF55.14x67.15x
BX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for GRAF. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.5%+14.3%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.3%+6.5%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.6%+16.1%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.8%+16.9%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9257
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.61x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$699$10.7B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$699$2.6B$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$13.3B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense14.12x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,023 for BX. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.2% total return vs BX's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BX at 14.6% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.9%-21.0%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.9%-9.3%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.4%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.2%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.1%+501.2%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.6%+13.7%
Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BX's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs BX's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.03x1.45x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.85$190.09$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.26$101.73$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.6%+64.6%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.753.960.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded59K5.0M12.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BX as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for BX (target: $156) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs KO's 2.46%.

MetricGRAF logoGRAFGraf Global Corp.BX logoBXBlackstone Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$156.29$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts2948
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.3%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises256
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$7.70$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+0.2%
Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallBlackstone Inc. (BX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GRAF vs BX vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GRAF or BX or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.

(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Blackstone Inc. (BX) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GRAF or BX or KO?

On trailing P/E, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the cheapest at 27.

2x versus Graf Global Corp. at 38. 8x. On forward P/E, Blackstone Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Blackstone Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or BX or KO?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to +50. 2% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BX returned +501. 2% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GRAF or BX or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Blackstone Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning BX is approximately -824% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GRAF or BX or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.

(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GRAF or BX or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GRAF or BX or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Blackstone Inc. (BX) trades at 20. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BX: 27. 3% to $156. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or BX or KO?

In this comparison, BX (6.

3% yield), KO (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GRAF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GRAF or BX or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, BX: +501. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GRAF and BX and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (GRAF (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BX, KO pay a dividend while GRAF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.