Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $312M | $85.80B | $96.22B | $9.46B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $19.04B | $13.83B | $2.32B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $2.37B | $3.02B | $717M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.5% | 86.0% | 62.0% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.3% | 51.9% | 29.5% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8x | 16.0x | 20.9x | 10.1x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $54.77B | $13.31B | $2.69B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699.00 | $6M | $2.63B | $586M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graf Global Corp. (GRAF) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 311.7 | +211.7% |
| Blackstone Inc. (BX) | 100 | 216.7 | +116.7% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 475.6 | +375.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRAF is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs KKR's 0.0%
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.8% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
BX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 60.8%, current ratio 0.91x
- Beta 1.45, yield 6.3%, current ratio 0.91x
- 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs GRAF's 2.34
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
- 30.9% margin vs GRAF's 4.0%
- +92.7% vs KKR's -22.6%
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- Beta 0.94 vs KKR's 1.58
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs KKR's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% NII/revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs GRAF's 4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs KKR's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.7% vs KKR's -22.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs KKR's 0.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs 0.3% |
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories
GRAF leads 0 • KKR leads 0 • BX leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • KO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KKR's 12.4%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $19.0B | $13.8B | $2.3B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $9.0B | $7.2B | $855M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $2.4B | $3.0B | $717M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$393,929 | $7.5B | $3.5B | $978M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% | +86.0% | +62.0% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +12.3% | +51.9% | +29.5% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.4% | +21.8% | +30.9% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +39.5% | +25.1% | +42.2% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | -1.7% | +41.3% | +149.1% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, AMG trades at a 62% valuation discount to KKR's 41.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.40x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $312M | $85.8B | $96.2B | $9.5B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312M | $140.6B | $106.9B | $11.6B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.79x | 41.13x | 31.65x | 15.59x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.97x | 20.85x | 10.15x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.34x | — | 1.51x | 0.40x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.73x | 14.82x | 12.21x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.45x | 6.96x | 3.87x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.13x | 4.38x | 2.65x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.01x | 55.14x | 9.42x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $3 for KKR. BX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +3.2% | +14.3% | +16.0% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +0.6% | +6.5% | +8.0% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +0.3% | +16.1% | +8.1% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +0.1% | +16.9% | +8.6% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x | 0.61x | 0.61x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$699 | $54.8B | $10.7B | $2.1B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699 | $6M | $2.6B | $586M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $54.8B | $13.3B | $2.7B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.29x | 14.12x | 9.69x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $22,089 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,023 for BX. Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +92.7% total return vs KKR's -22.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMG at 34.5% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -25.0% | -21.0% | +22.8% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | -22.6% | -9.3% | +92.7% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +76.7% | +50.4% | +143.1% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +80.1% | +50.2% | +120.9% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +682.0% | +501.2% | +128.3% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +20.9% | +14.6% | +34.5% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMG and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMG currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 62.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 1.58x | 1.45x | 1.09x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $153.87 | $190.09 | $355.55 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.26 | $82.67 | $101.73 | $179.79 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +62.5% | +64.6% | +99.7% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 48.8 | 53.9 | 73.3 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 4.2M | 5.0M | 315K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BX and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KKR as "Buy", BX as "Buy", AMG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.7% upside for KKR (target: $141) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, BX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.27% vs KKR's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $141.14 | $156.29 | $402.50 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 29 | 12 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +6.3% | +0.0% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | $7.70 | $0.03 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +7.5% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
GRAF vs KKR vs BX vs AMG vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is the stronger pick with 21. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 41. 1x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) delivered a total return of +120. 9%, compared to +50. 2% for Blackstone Inc. (BX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +682. 0% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning KKR is approximately -888% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Blackstone Inc. (BX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackstone Inc.
(BX) is pulling ahead at 21. 6% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BX leads at 51. 9% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BX leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 46. 7% to $141. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO?
In this comparison, BX (6.
3% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GRAF, AMG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRAF or KKR or BX or AMG or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AMG: +128. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRAF and KKR and BX and AMG and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (GRAF (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services) and BX (Financial Services) and AMG (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. KKR, BX, JPM, KO pay a dividend while GRAF, AMG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.