GRC vs NDSN

For growth investors, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Nordson Corporation (NDSN) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nordson Corporation (NDSN) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the cheapest at 33.

3x versus The Gorman-Rupp Company at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Nordson Corporation is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nordson Corporation wins at 1. 68x versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 89x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) delivered a total return of +127.

8%, compared to +42. 3% for Nordson Corporation (NDSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NDSN returned +297. 4% versus GRC's +212. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

04β versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 23β — meaning GRC is approximately 18% more volatile than NDSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 79% for The Gorman-Rupp Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus 3. 4% for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Gorman-Rupp Company grew EPS 32. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for Nordson Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRC leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus 7. 8% for The Gorman-Rupp Company — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NDSN leads at 25. 5% versus 14. 0% for GRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NDSN leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 68x versus The Gorman-Rupp Company's 1. 89x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 9x for The Gorman-Rupp Company — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Nordson Corporation (NDSN) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 1. 0% for The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nordson Corporation (NDSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

04), 1. 1% yield, +297. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NDSN: +297. 4%, GRC: +212. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.