Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRND vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
GRND vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $2.49B | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $412M | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 74.5% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.0% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $294M | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $59M | $30.71B |
GRND vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grindr Inc. (GRND) | 100 | 126.1 | +26.1% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 435.4 | +335.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRND vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.58
- Rev growth 32.7%, EPS growth -131.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, current ratio 1.73x
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs GRND's 26.4%
- 37.9% margin vs GRND's -12.0%
- 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.7% revenue growth vs GOOGL's 15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs GRND's -12.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs GOOGL's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +144.2% vs GRND's -42.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs GRND's -11.2%, ROIC 25.1% vs 34.6% |
GRND vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRND vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GRND and GOOGL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1026.8x GRND's $412M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRND's -12.0%. On growth, GRND holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $412M | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $124M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $140M | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.5% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.0% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GRND leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GRND's 25.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GOOGL's 32.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.5B | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.23x | 36.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.10x | 29.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.71x | 32.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.22x | 11.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.47x | 65.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GRND. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs GRND's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -69.6% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.2% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.6% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.3% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $235M | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $59M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $294M | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.24x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $34,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,330 for GRND. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +144.2% total return vs GRND's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs GRND's 28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | +26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.3% | +144.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.8% | +270.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.3% | +241.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.4% | +1001.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRND and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRND is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs GRND's 53.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.13 | $399.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.73 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.7% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 81.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GRND as "Buy" and GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for GRND (target: $14) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GRND leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GRND vs GOOGL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRND or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grindr Inc.
(GRND) is the stronger pick with 32. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) offers the better valuation at 36. 8x trailing P/E (29. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grindr Inc. (GRND) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRND or GOOGL?
On forward P/E, Grindr Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRND or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +241. 8%, compared to +33. 3% for Grindr Inc. (GRND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1002% versus GRND's +26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRND or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grindr Inc.
(GRND) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately 118% more volatile than GRND relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GRND or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grindr Inc.
(GRND) is pulling ahead at 32. 7% versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -131. 3% for Grindr Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GRND leads at 33. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRND or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -38. 0% for Grindr Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 26. 9% for GRND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GRND leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRND or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Grindr Inc.
(GRND) trades at 25. 1x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRND: 3. 8% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRND or GOOGL?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GRND does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRND or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +1002% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +1002%, GRND: +26. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRND and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (GRND (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare GOOGL vs META
META is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GOOGL.
Compare GRND vs MTCH
MTCH is one of the most direct listed alternatives to GRND.
Expand With META + AAPL
META and AAPL are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.