Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GSBD vs GBDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GSBD vs GBDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.12B | $3.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $242M | $871M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $205M |
| Gross Margin | 75.4% | 81.5% |
| Operating Margin | 98.4% | 78.9% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.88B | $4.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $24M |
GSBD vs GBDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goldman Sachs BDC, … (GSBD) | 100 | 59.2 | -40.8% |
| Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSBD vs GBDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSBD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.50, yield 20.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 0.95x
- Beta 0.50, yield 20.3%, current ratio 0.95x
GBDC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
- 61.0% 10Y total return vs GSBD's 44.7%
- 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs GSBD's 26.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs GSBD's 26.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 49.2% margin vs GBDC's 43.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs GBDC's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | 20.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GBDC's 10.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.9% vs GBDC's +3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs GBDC's 2.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.9% |
GSBD vs GBDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GSBD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GBDC is the larger business by revenue, generating $871M annually — 3.6x GSBD's $242M. GSBD is the more profitable business, keeping 49.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GBDC's 43.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $242M | $871M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $202M | $313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.4% | +81.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +98.4% | +78.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +43.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +134.3% | -13.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -144.4% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GBDC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, GBDC trades at a 4% valuation discount to GSBD's 9.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GBDC's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSBD's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.65x | 9.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.06x | 9.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.57x | 12.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.62x | 3.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.81x | 0.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.44x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSBD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSBD delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $5 for GBDC. GBDC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSBD's 1.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSBD scores 6/9 vs GBDC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.0% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 1.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.05x | 1.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GBDC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GBDC five years ago would be worth $13,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,665 for GSBD. Over the past 12 months, GSBD leads with a +11.9% total return vs GBDC's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GBDC at 10.6% vs GSBD's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.9% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.2% | +35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | +33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.7% | +61.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.4% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSBD and GBDC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSBD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GBDC's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.03 | $15.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $11.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.3 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
GSBD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GSBD as "Hold" and GBDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for GBDC (target: $14) vs -9.5% for GSBD (target: $9). For income investors, GSBD offers the higher dividend yield at 20.33% vs GBDC's 10.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $14.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +20.3% | +10.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.02 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +2.3% |
GSBD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GBDC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
GSBD vs GBDC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSBD or GBDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 0% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSBD or GBDC?
On trailing P/E, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. at 9. 7x. On forward P/E, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSBD or GBDC?
Over the past 5 years, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to -3. 4% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GBDC returned +61. 0% versus GSBD's +44. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSBD or GBDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Golub Capital BDC, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning GBDC is approximately 29% more volatile than GSBD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 123% versus 132% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSBD or GBDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus 26. 0% for Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. grew EPS 87. 3% year-over-year, compared to 4. 4% for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSBD or GBDC?
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 2% net margin versus 43. 2% for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSBD leads at 98. 4% versus 78. 9% for GBDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GBDC leads at 81. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSBD or GBDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GBDC: 9. 0% to $14. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSBD or GBDC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) offers the highest yield at 20. 3%, versus 10. 5% for Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC).
09Is GSBD or GBDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
(GSBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 20. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSBD: +44. 7%, GBDC: +61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSBD and GBDC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.