Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $292M | $53.62B | $7.17B | $5.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $4.37B | $785M | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-97M | $-65M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 55.4% | 58.2% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | -58.9% | 4.1% | -9.0% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 63.2x | 80.3x | 42.6x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $5.67B | $0.00 | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $772M | $364M | $367M |
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 206.4 | +106.4% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.2 | +132.2% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 229.1 | +129.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSIT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 1.8%
- 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
SLAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
- Beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
- 34.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
DIOD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 484.5% 10Y total return vs SLAB's 374.6%
- Lower P/E (42.6x vs 80.3x)
- 5.5% margin vs GSIT's -43.1%
- +179.0% vs SLAB's +95.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (42.6x vs 80.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs GSIT's -43.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs GSIT's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.0% vs SLAB's +95.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs GSIT's -17.4%, ROIC 1.6% vs -34.2% |
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DIOD leads in 3 of 6 categories
SLAB leads 1 • MCHP leads 1 • GSIT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MCHP and SLAB and DIOD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 177.1x GSIT's $25M. DIOD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSIT's -43.1%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $4.4B | $785M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $881M | -$32M | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$97M | -$65M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $820M | $66M | $129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +55.4% | +58.2% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.9% | +4.1% | -9.0% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.1% | -2.2% | -8.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.5% | +18.8% | +8.4% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +15.6% | +25.2% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.3% | +164.2% | +88.8% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MCHP's 55.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $292M | $53.6B | $7.2B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $288M | $58.5B | $6.8B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.12x | -9999.00x | -109.82x | 77.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 63.20x | 80.34x | 42.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 55.92x | — | 27.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.21x | 12.18x | 9.13x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.65x | 7.52x | 6.50x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 69.45x | 108.93x | 37.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DIOD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DIOD delivers a 4.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-23 for GSIT. DIOD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIOD scores 6/9 vs GSIT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.7% | -1.4% | -5.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.4% | -0.7% | -5.1% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.2% | +1.8% | -6.9% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.5% | +2.1% | -6.3% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.80x | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $4.9B | -$364M | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $772M | $364M | $367M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $5.7B | $0 | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.78x | -58.63x | 66.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DIOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLAB five years ago would be worth $17,055 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,670 for GSIT. Over the past 12 months, DIOD leads with a +179.0% total return vs SLAB's +95.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSIT at 72.4% vs DIOD's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.6% | +53.1% | +64.8% | +116.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +143.5% | +105.4% | +95.8% | +179.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +412.1% | +40.6% | +58.8% | +32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | +48.7% | +70.5% | +57.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.7% | +363.4% | +374.6% | +484.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +72.4% | +12.0% | +16.7% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSIT's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs GSIT's 46.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 1.69x | 1.20x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.15 | $105.91 | $218.66 | $117.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.82 | $48.52 | $109.77 | $39.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.6% | +93.6% | +99.4% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 78.9 | 69.1 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 959K | 9.1M | 457K | 546K |
Analyst Outlook
MCHP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GSIT as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.7% upside for DIOD (target: $120) vs -2.7% for SLAB (target: $212). MCHP is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $106.35 | $211.60 | $120.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 46 | 37 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.82 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
DIOD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SLAB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GSIT vs MCHP vs SLAB vs DIOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 77. 9x trailing P/E (42. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 42.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
Over the past 5 years, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) delivered a total return of +70. 5%, compared to +46. 7% for GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIOD returned +484. 5% versus GSIT's +134. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus GSI Technology, Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning GSIT is approximately 159% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLAB leads at -8. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
5% net margin versus -51. 9% for GSI Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCHP leads at 6. 7% versus -52. 8% for GSIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 42.
6x forward P/E versus 80. 3x for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIOD: 7. 7% to $120. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. GSIT, SLAB, DIOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GSIT or MCHP or SLAB or DIOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +363. 4% 10Y return). GSI Technology, Inc. (GSIT) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCHP: +363. 4%, GSIT: +134. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSIT and MCHP and SLAB and DIOD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GSIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MCHP pays a dividend while GSIT, SLAB, DIOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.