GSL vs MATX

For growth investors, Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for Matson, Inc. (MATX). Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E (4. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Matson, Inc. at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Global Ship Lease, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global Ship Lease, Inc. wins at 0. 11x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) delivered a total return of +232. 6%, compared to +181. 0% for Matson, Inc. (MATX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MATX returned +476. 1% versus GSL's +262. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning MATX is approximately 75% more volatile than GSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 38% for Global Ship Lease, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -2. 3% for Matson, Inc. (MATX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global Ship Lease, Inc. grew EPS 17. 3% year-over-year, compared to -0. 4% for Matson, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSL leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is the more profitable company, earning 54. 3% net margin versus 13. 3% for Matson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 54. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSL leads at 50. 7% versus 14. 0% for MATX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSL leads at 53. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Matson, Inc. 's 0. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Matson, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GSL: 8. 4% to $45. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Matson, Inc. (MATX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Global Ship Lease, Inc.

(GSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 5. 1% yield, +262. 2% 10Y return). Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a higher beta of 1. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSL: +262. 2%, MATX: +476. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.