Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GSM vs AMG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$741M
5Y Perf.+457.3%
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.95B
5Y Perf.+347.0%

GSM vs AMG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GSM logoGSM
AMG logoAMG
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsAsset Management
Market Cap$741M$7.95B
Revenue (TTM)$1.38B$2.45B
Net Income (TTM)$-111M$717M
Gross Margin2.8%86.0%
Operating Margin-12.5%31.8%
Forward P/E30.5x9.0x
Total Debt$293M$2.69B
Cash & Equiv.$123M$586M

GSM vs AMGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GSM
AMG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ferroglobe PLC (GSM)100557.3+457.3%
Affiliated Managers… (AMG)100447.0+347.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GSM vs AMG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMG leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ferroglobe PLC is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
The Income Pick

GSM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 1.4%
  • 1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMG's 0.0%
Best for: income & stability
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
  • 86.2% 10Y total return vs GSM's -54.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 60.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMG logoAMG19.8% NII/revenue growth vs GSM's -18.8%
ValueAMG logoAMGLower P/E (9.0x vs 30.5x)
Quality / MarginsAMG logoAMG29.3% margin vs GSM's -8.1%
Stability / SafetyAMG logoAMGBeta 1.14 vs GSM's 1.43
DividendsGSM logoGSM1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMG's 0.0%
Momentum (1Y)AMG logoAMG+70.0% vs GSM's +17.9%
Efficiency (ROA)AMG logoAMG8.0% ROA vs GSM's -7.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs -16.9%

GSM vs AMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GSMFerroglobe PLC
FY 2025
Silicon Metal Product Line
32.2%$430M
Manganese Alloys Product Line
26.8%$358M
Ferrosilicon Product Line
21.2%$283M
Other Product Lines
9.1%$121M
Other Silicon Based Alloys Product Line
8.7%$116M
Silica Fume Product Line
2.1%$28M
AMGAffiliated Managers Group, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GSM vs AMG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMGLAGGINGGSM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

AMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 1.8x GSM's $1.4B. AMG is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSM's -8.1%.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.4B$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$104M$855M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$111M$717M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$39M$978M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.8%+86.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.5%+31.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.1%+29.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%+41.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.6%+149.1%
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GSM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
Market CapShares × price$741M$7.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$911M$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.36x13.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.50x8.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.55x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.08x2.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.91x
GSM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

AMG delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-15 for GSM. GSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMG's 0.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs GSM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.0%+16.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-7.2%+8.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.9%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.8%+8.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–938
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.42x0.61x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$170M$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$123M$586M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$293M$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-7.47x9.69x
AMG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMG five years ago would be worth $17,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,105 for GSM. Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +70.0% total return vs GSM's +17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMG at 28.0% vs GSM's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.3%+3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+17.9%+70.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.0%+109.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.0%+71.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.4%+86.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.3%+28.0%
AMG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSM's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMG currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs GSM's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.43x1.14x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.74$334.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.04$172.54
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+69.1%+88.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.661.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M345K
AMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates GSM as "Buy" and AMG as "Buy". GSM is the only dividend payer here at 1.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGSM logoGSMFerroglobe PLCAMG logoAMGAffiliated Manage…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$331.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1112
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.4%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.06$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%+8.9%
GSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AMG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GSM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallAffiliated Managers Group, … (AMG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GSM vs AMG: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GSM or AMG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 8% for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GSM or AMG?

On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GSM or AMG?

Over the past 5 years, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) delivered a total return of +71. 7%, compared to -9. 0% for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMG returned +86. 2% versus GSM's -54. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GSM or AMG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Ferroglobe PLC's 1. 43β — meaning GSM is approximately 25% more volatile than AMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 61% for Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — GSM or AMG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -18. 8% for Ferroglobe PLC (GSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -31. 3% for Ferroglobe PLC. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — GSM or AMG?

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -12. 8% for Ferroglobe PLC — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMG leads at 31. 8% versus -14. 9% for GSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is GSM or AMG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.

(AMG) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 5x for Ferroglobe PLC — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — GSM or AMG?

In this comparison, GSM (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is GSM or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GSM: -54. 4%, AMG: +86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between GSM and AMG?

These companies operate in different sectors (GSM (Basic Materials) and AMG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GSM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. GSM pays a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

GSM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GSM and AMG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GSM: 13.2% · AMG: 19.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.