GTIM vs RAVE

For growth investors, Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE). Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. at 15. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.

(RAVE) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to -73. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RAVE returned -42. 0% versus GTIM's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning RAVE is approximately 20% more volatile than GTIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 124% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -0. 9% for RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. (RAVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. grew EPS 11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -31. 6% for Good Times Restaurants Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RAVE leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc.

(RAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 4% net margin versus 0. 7% for Good Times Restaurants Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAVE leads at 27. 1% versus 0. 2% for GTIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAVE leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Good Times Restaurants Inc.

(GTIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTIM: -63. 7%, RAVE: -42. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.