Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) vs DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | DV | 13.9% revenue growth vs GTM's 2.9% |
| Value | GTM | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 20.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | GTM | 9.9% net margin vs DV's 6.8% |
| Stability / Safety | DV | Beta 1.00 vs GTM's 1.81, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DV | -24.2% vs GTM's -46.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | DV | 3.7% ROA vs GTM's 1.9%, ROIC 6.4% vs 5.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
ZoomInfo is a go-to-market intelligence platform that provides comprehensive data on companies and professionals for sales, marketing, and recruiting teams. It generates revenue primarily through subscription-based access to its cloud platform—with tiered pricing for different organizational sizes—and additional fees for premium data and workflow tools. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive, continuously updated database of business contacts and buying signals—a network effect that becomes more valuable as more users contribute data.
DoubleVerify is a digital media measurement and analytics platform that helps advertisers verify the quality and effectiveness of their online advertising. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its verification services — including fraud detection, brand safety, viewability, and contextual targeting solutions — with most revenue coming from advertisers and agencies. The company's key advantage is its independent, third-party verification status which creates trust and objectivity in an industry plagued by fraud and opaque metrics.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
DV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GTM leads in 2 (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GTM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 1.7x DV's $748M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.9% (GTM) to 6.8% (DV). On growth, DV holds the edge at +7.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $748M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $280M | $136M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | $173M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.8% | +82.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, GTM trades at a 55% valuation discount to DV's 35.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTM's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DV's 11.4x.
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.92x | 35.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.59x | 20.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.26x | 11.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.91x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTM delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for DV. DV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTM's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTM scores 7/9 vs DV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.6% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $75M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.56x | 26.89x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in DV five years ago would be worth $2,928 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,101 for GTM. Over the past 12 months, DV leads with a -24.2% total return vs GTM's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DV at -26.2% vs GTM's -36.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.4% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.7% | -24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | -59.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.0% | -70.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.7% | -69.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.4% | -26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
DV is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTM's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DV currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs GTM's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.81x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.51 | $17.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.77 | $7.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.9 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.6M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTM as "Hold" and DV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for GTM (target: $9) vs 34.2% for DV (target: $14).
| Metric | GTMZoomInfo Technolo… | DVDoubleVerify Hold… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.29 | $14.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +21.5% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 100 | 15.65 | -84.4% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 99.33 | 29.44 | -70.4% |
DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) returned -71% over 5 years vs ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM)'s -89%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | $144M | $1.2B | +765.9% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | $104M | $748M | +617.4% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s revenue grew from $144M (2018) to $1.2B (2025) — a 36.1% CAGR. DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $104M (2018) to $748M (2025) — a 32.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | -19.8% | 9.9% | +150.2% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 3.0% | 6.8% | +122.2% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s net margin went from -20% (2018) to 10% (2025). DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 3% (2018) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | 214 | 26.1 | -87.8% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 184.9 | 38.1 | -79.4% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. has traded in a 26x–214x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~16x. DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 38x–185x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZoomInfo Technologi… (GTM) | -0.2 | 0.39 | +295.0% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 0.02 | 0.3 | +1363.4% |
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.20 (2018) to $0.39 (2025). DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.02 (2018) to $0.30 (2025) — a 47% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. generated $389M FCF in 2025 (+41% vs 2021). DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. generated $173M FCF in 2025 (+135% vs 2021).
GTM vs DV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTM or DV a better buy right now?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) offers the better valuation at 15.9x trailing P/E (5.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTM or DV?
On trailing P/E, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) is the cheapest at 15.9x versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. at 35.1x. On forward P/E, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. is actually cheaper at 5.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTM or DV?
Over the past 5 years, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) delivered a total return of -70.7%, compared to -89.0% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM). A $10,000 investment in DV five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DV returned -69.7% versus GTM's -81.7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTM or DV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.00β versus ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.'s 1.81β — meaning GTM is approximately 82% more volatile than DV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 120% for ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — GTM or DV?
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus 6.8% for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTM leads at 18.1% versus 10.6% for DV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTM leads at 82.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GTM or DV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) trades at 5.6x forward P/E versus 20.2x for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. — 14.6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTM: 49.6% to $9.29.
07Which pays a better dividend — GTM or DV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GTM or DV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00)). ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) carries a higher beta of 1.81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DV: -69.7%, GTM: -81.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GTM and DV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: GTM is a small-cap deep-value stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.