GWRS vs AWR

For growth investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger pick with 10.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). American States Water Company (AWR) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, American States Water Company (AWR) is the cheapest at 22.

8x versus Global Water Resources, Inc. at 65. 1x. On forward P/E, American States Water Company is actually cheaper at 20. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American States Water Company wins at 2. 70x versus Global Water Resources, Inc. 's 3. 02x.

Over the past 5 years, American States Water Company (AWR) delivered a total return of +7.

3%, compared to -47. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWR returned +123. 2% versus GWRS's +39. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American States Water Company (AWR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

17β versus Global Water Resources, Inc. 's 0. 71β — meaning GWRS is approximately -511% more volatile than AWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 90% for American States Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), American States Water Company (AWR) is pulling ahead at 10.

5% versus 5. 8% for Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American States Water Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Global Water Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWR leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

American States Water Company (AWR) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

8% net margin versus 5. 3% for Global Water Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWR leads at 30. 9% versus 12. 8% for GWRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWR leads at 50. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, American States Water Company (AWR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 70x versus Global Water Resources, Inc. 's 3. 02x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American States Water Company (AWR) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Global Water Resources, Inc. — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GWRS: 74. 6% to $12. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 5% for American States Water Company (AWR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, American States Water Company (AWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

17), 2. 5% yield, +123. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWR: +123. 2%, GWRS: +39. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GWRS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.