Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs GOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
GYRO vs GOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $17M | $599M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $166M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | -11.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 27.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 80.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $11M |
GYRO vs GOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs GOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 4.13x
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 49.8% 10Y total return vs GYRO's -30.3%
- 11.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs GOOD's 12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs GOOD's 0.55 | |
| Dividends | 11.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.8% vs GOOD's -3.6% |
GYRO vs GOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOD is the larger business by revenue, generating $166M annually — 59.2x GYRO's $3M.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $166M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $106M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | -11.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +27.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | +54.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $599M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 30.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 80.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355313.22x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GYRO and GOOD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOD scores 4/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $856M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 1.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOD five years ago would be worth $8,994 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,703 for GYRO. Over the past 12 months, GYRO leads with a +1.8% total return vs GOOD's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.1% vs GYRO's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.8% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | -10.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GYRO and GOOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GYRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOD currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $15.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 65.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
GYRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GOOD is the only dividend payer here at 11.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +11.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
GYRO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GOOD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GYRO vs GOOD: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GYRO or GOOD a better buy right now?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the better valuation at 30.
2x trailing P/E (80. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or GOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) delivered a total return of -10.
1%, compared to -43. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOD returned +49. 8% versus GYRO's -30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GYRO or GOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 68% more volatile than GYRO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — GYRO or GOOD?
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOD leads at 37. 2% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or GOOD?
In this comparison, GOOD (11.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is GYRO or GOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 11. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOD: +49. 8%, GYRO: -30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GYRO and GOOD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GOOD pays a dividend while GYRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.