Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs HNNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GYRO vs HNNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $17M | $79M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $36M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $9M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 37.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $41M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $72M |
GYRO vs HNNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Hennessy Advisors, … (HNNA) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs HNNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- -30.1% 10Y total return vs HNNA's -31.3%
- 99.6% margin vs HNNA's 28.0%
HNNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 41.4%, current ratio 12.72x
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.4%, current ratio 12.72x
- Beta 0.30 vs GYRO's 0.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs HNNA's 28.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs GYRO's 0.33 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.8% vs GYRO's -2.3% |
GYRO vs HNNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GYRO vs HNNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HNNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $36M annually — 12.7x GYRO's $3M.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $36M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +70.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +37.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +28.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | +37.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $79M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $47M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 7.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355312.39x | 3.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HNNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNNA scores 7/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | -$32M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 10.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HNNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HNNA five years ago would be worth $13,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,952 for GYRO. Over the past 12 months, HNNA leads with a -1.8% total return vs GYRO's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNNA at 15.9% vs GYRO's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.1% | +4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -1.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.9% | +55.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.5% | +34.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | -31.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HNNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GYRO's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HNNA currently trades 75.5% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $13.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $8.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 9K |
Analyst Outlook
GYRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
HNNA is the only dividend payer here at 5.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.54 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
GYRO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HNNA leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
GYRO vs HNNA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GYRO or HNNA a better buy right now?
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or HNNA?
Over the past 5 years, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) delivered a total return of +34. 7%, compared to -40. 5% for Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GYRO returned -30. 1% versus HNNA's -31. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GYRO or HNNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Gyrodyne, LLC's 0. 33β — meaning GYRO is approximately 9% more volatile than HNNA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — GYRO or HNNA?
Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 28. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HNNA leads at 37. 0% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or HNNA?
In this comparison, HNNA (5.
4% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is GYRO or HNNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hennessy Advisors, Inc.
(HNNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 5. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNNA: -31. 3%, GYRO: -30. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GYRO and HNNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (GYRO (Real Estate) and HNNA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNNA is a small-cap high-growth stock. HNNA pays a dividend while GYRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.