Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs STRR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
GYRO vs STRR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $17M | $30M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | -1.0% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $17M |
GYRO vs STRR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Star Equity Holding… (STRR) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs STRR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- 99.6% margin vs STRR's -5.4%
- -2.3% vs STRR's -5.8%
STRR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 47.2% 10Y total return vs GYRO's -30.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 3.58x
- Beta 0.19, yield 6.7%, current ratio 3.58x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs STRR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs GYRO's 0.33 | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -2.3% vs STRR's -5.8% |
GYRO vs STRR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GYRO vs STRR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRR is the larger business by revenue, generating $114M annually — 40.6x GYRO's $3M.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GYRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $30M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -2.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355312.39x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GYRO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRR scores 3/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | -8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | -24.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | -18.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | -$16M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | -47.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GYRO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GYRO five years ago would be worth $5,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,192 for STRR. Over the past 12 months, GYRO leads with a -2.3% total return vs STRR's -5.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GYRO at -3.4% vs STRR's -24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.1% | -9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | -5.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.9% | -57.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.5% | -48.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | +47.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | -24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
STRR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STRR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GYRO's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STRR currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $11.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $1.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 8K |
Analyst Outlook
GYRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
STRR is the only dividend payer here at 6.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
GYRO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STRR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
GYRO vs STRR: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or STRR?
Over the past 5 years, Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) delivered a total return of -40.
5%, compared to -48. 1% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRR returned +47. 2% versus GYRO's -30. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — GYRO or STRR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Gyrodyne, LLC's 0. 33β — meaning GYRO is approximately 72% more volatile than STRR relative to the S&P 500.
03Which has better profit margins — GYRO or STRR?
Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -19. 6% for Star Equity Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GYRO leads at -1. 2% versus -15. 8% for STRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or STRR?
In this comparison, STRR (6.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
05Is GYRO or STRR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Equity Holdings, Inc.
(STRR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 6. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STRR: +47. 2%, GYRO: -30. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between GYRO and STRR?
These companies operate in different sectors (GYRO (Real Estate) and STRR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STRR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. STRR pays a dividend while GYRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.