Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
GYRO vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $17M | $150.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 78.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $5.03B |
GYRO vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- 99.6% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 230.2% 10Y total return vs GYRO's -30.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs GYRO's 0.33 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs GYRO's -2.3% |
GYRO vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GYRO vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 4156.8x GYRO's $3M.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $150.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $166.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 154.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 78.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355312.39x | 66.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 3.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 52.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GYRO and WELL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,952 for GYRO. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs GYRO's -2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs GYRO's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.1% | +15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.3% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.9% | +182.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.5% | +212.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | +230.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.4% | +41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GYRO's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GYRO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
WELL is the only dividend payer here at 1.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GYRO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GYRO vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GYRO or WELL a better buy right now?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) offers the better valuation at 154. 2x trailing P/E (78. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -40. 5% for Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +230. 2% versus GYRO's -30. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GYRO or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Gyrodyne, LLC's 0. 33β — meaning GYRO is approximately 148% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — GYRO or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WELL leads at 3. 3% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or WELL?
In this comparison, WELL (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is GYRO or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +230. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +230. 2%, GYRO: -30. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GYRO and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WELL pays a dividend while GYRO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.