Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HAFN vs INSW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HAFN
Hafnia Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • SG
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.+14.4%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+63.1%

HAFN vs INSW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HAFN logoHAFN
INSW logoINSW
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.40B$4.46B
Revenue (TTM)$2.28B$676M
Net Income (TTM)$340M$546M
Gross Margin18.8%40.6%
Operating Margin15.5%44.4%
Forward P/E7.6x8.5x
Total Debt$1.14B$576M
Cash & Equiv.$193M$117M

HAFN vs INSWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HAFN
INSW
StockApr 24May 26Return
Hafnia Limited (HAFN)100114.4+14.4%
International Seawa… (INSW)100163.1+63.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HAFN vs INSW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hafnia Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
The Income Pick

HAFN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 4.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 48.9%, current ratio 1.53x
  • Beta 0.29, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.53x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Growth Play

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
  • 10.1% 10Y total return vs HAFN's 91.1%
  • -11.4% revenue growth vs HAFN's -18.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINSW logoINSW-11.4% revenue growth vs HAFN's -18.1%
ValueHAFN logoHAFNLower P/E (7.6x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW80.8% margin vs HAFN's 14.9%
Stability / SafetyHAFN logoHAFNBeta 0.29 vs INSW's 0.43
DividendsHAFN logoHAFN4.6% yield, vs INSW's 3.2%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+160.2% vs HAFN's +98.0%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs HAFN's 8.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 7.9%

HAFN vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HAFNHafnia Limited
FY 2024
Non lease component
100.0%$40M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M

HAFN vs INSW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINSWLAGGINGHAFN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

HAFN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 3.4x INSW's $676M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAFN's 14.9%. On growth, HAFN holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.3B$676M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$555M$465M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$340M$546M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$444M$193M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.8%+40.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.5%+44.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.9%+80.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.5%+28.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.3%-91.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+46.7%+4.8%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HAFN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, HAFN trades at a 12% valuation discount to INSW's 14.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HAFN's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.5x.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Market CapShares × price$4.4B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.3B$4.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.80x14.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.64x8.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.82x10.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.87x5.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.91x2.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.69x117.08x
HAFN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INSW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $15 for HAFN. INSW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAFN's 0.49x.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.6%+27.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.9%+20.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.9%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.7%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$946M$459M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$193M$117M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$576M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.15x0.90x
INSW leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,739 for HAFN. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs HAFN's +98.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs HAFN's 20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.2%+96.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+98.0%+160.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.4%+179.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+87.4%+438.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+91.1%+1014.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+20.8%+40.9%
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HAFN and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HAFN is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs HAFN's 92.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.29x0.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.54$91.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.88$35.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.6%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.867.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M597K
Evenly matched — HAFN and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HAFN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates HAFN as "Buy" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.3% upside for HAFN (target: $10) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, HAFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.59% vs INSW's 3.23%.

MetricHAFN logoHAFNHafnia LimitedINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$83.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.6%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.41$2.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%0.0%
HAFN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAFN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallInternational Seaways, Inc. (INSW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HAFN vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HAFN or INSW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 1% for Hafnia Limited (HAFN). Hafnia Limited (HAFN) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hafnia Limited (HAFN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HAFN or INSW?

On trailing P/E, Hafnia Limited (HAFN) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 14. 5x. On forward P/E, Hafnia Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HAFN or INSW?

Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +87. 4% for Hafnia Limited (HAFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus HAFN's +91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HAFN or INSW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hafnia Limited (HAFN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

29β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 48% more volatile than HAFN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 49% for Hafnia Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HAFN or INSW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -18. 1% for Hafnia Limited (HAFN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -54. 0% for Hafnia Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAFN leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HAFN or INSW?

International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 14. 9% for Hafnia Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 14. 3% for HAFN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HAFN or INSW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hafnia Limited (HAFN) trades at 7.

6x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for International Seaways, Inc. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HAFN: 13. 3% to $10. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HAFN or INSW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hafnia Limited (HAFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 3. 2% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).

09

Is HAFN or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, HAFN: +91. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HAFN and INSW?

These companies operate in different sectors (HAFN (Industrials) and INSW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HAFN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSW

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 48%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HAFN and INSW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HAFN: 11.3% · INSW: -91.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HAFN: 14.9% · INSW: 80.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HAFN: 12.8x · INSW: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.