HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$34.84B
5Y Perf.+255.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$84.06B
5Y Perf.+203.2%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$67.22B
5Y Perf.+310.5%
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$7.79B
5Y Perf.+5330.5%
RES
RPC, Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.73B
5Y Perf.+145.3%
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HAL | SLB | BKR | WFRD | RES |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $34.84B | $84.06B | $67.22B | $7.79B | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.17B | $35.71B | $27.89B | $4.88B | $1.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.54B | $3.35B | $3.12B | $463M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 18.2% | 23.6% | 45.9% | 14.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 15.3% | 25.3% | 15.1% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 20.9x | 28.3x | 19.0x | 37.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.13B | $12.31B | $7.14B | $1.75B | $95M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.21B | $3.04B | $3.71B | $1.04B | $210M |
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HAL
SLB
BKR
WFRD
RES
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 355.0 | +255.0% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 303.2 | +203.2% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 410.5 | +310.5% |
| Weatherford Interna… (WFRD) | 100 | 5430.5 | +5330.5% |
| RPC, Inc. (RES) | 100 | 245.3 | +145.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RES leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Weatherford International plc is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. HAL and BKR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick
HAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.7%
- Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.8x)
Best for: income & stability
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Energy Pick
Among these 5 stocks, SLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 11.2% margin vs RES's 2.0%
Best for: growth exposure
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
The Long-Run Compounder
WFRD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 350.5% 10Y total return vs BKR's 195.1%
- +151.8% vs RES's +64.5%
- 9.3% ROA vs RES's 2.2%, ROIC 24.9% vs 4.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
RES
RPC, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
RES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 3.24x
- Beta 0.54, yield 2.1%, current ratio 3.24x
- 15.0% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8%
- Beta 0.54 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RES | 15.0% revenue growth vs WFRD's -10.8% |
| Value | HAL | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | BKR | 11.2% margin vs RES's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | RES | Beta 0.54 vs WFRD's 1.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RES | 2.1% yield, vs SLB's 1.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WFRD | +151.8% vs RES's +64.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WFRD | 9.3% ROA vs RES's 2.2%, ROIC 24.9% vs 4.8% |
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGSLB
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 1 of 6 categories
RES leads 1 • WFRD leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
HALHalliburton Company
0leads
RESRPC, Inc.
1leads
WFRDWeatherford Internati…
1leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WFRDvs RESMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BKR3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RES3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WFRD5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 22.0x RES's $1.6B. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RES's 2.0%. On growth, RES holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.2B | $35.7B | $27.9B | $4.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $7.4B | $4.5B | $1.0B | $218M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $3.4B | $3.1B | $463M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $4.8B | $2.6B | $466M | $53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +18.2% | +23.6% | +45.9% | +14.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +15.3% | +25.3% | +15.1% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +9.4% | +11.2% | +9.5% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +13.4% | +9.4% | +9.6% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | +5.0% | +2.5% | -3.4% | +27.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.2% | -31.2% | +132.5% | +44.7% | -124.9% |
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.3x trailing earnings, WFRD trades at a 65% valuation discount to RES's 52.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RES's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.9x.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34.8B | $84.1B | $67.2B | $7.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40.8B | $93.3B | $70.7B | $8.5B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.81x | 23.83x | 26.07x | 18.32x | 52.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.96x | 20.90x | 28.26x | 19.05x | 37.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.00x | 12.67x | 14.89x | 8.31x | 7.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.57x | 2.35x | 2.42x | 1.58x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.34x | 3.05x | 3.54x | 4.65x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.84x | 17.53x | 26.50x | 17.31x | 32.67x |
RES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WFRD delivers a 28.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $3 for RES. RES carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WFRD's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs RES's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +13.9% | +16.1% | +28.3% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +6.5% | +7.3% | +9.3% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +12.1% | +12.7% | +24.9% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.6% | +14.3% | +13.6% | +21.2% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.45x | 0.38x | 1.03x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.9B | $9.3B | $3.4B | $709M | -$115M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $3.0B | $3.7B | $1.0B | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $12.3B | $7.1B | $1.8B | $95M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.19x | 9.40x | 9.68x | 5.45x | 10.86x |
WFRD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BKR and WFRD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WFRD five years ago would be worth $102,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,510 for RES. Over the past 12 months, WFRD leads with a +151.8% total return vs RES's +64.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 35.7% vs RES's 5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.5% | +40.0% | +44.8% | +34.6% | +41.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +113.5% | +69.3% | +87.6% | +151.8% | +64.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | +29.6% | +150.1% | +81.6% | +18.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.3% | +99.6% | +218.8% | +922.1% | +55.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.1% | -8.4% | +195.1% | +350.5% | -32.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +9.0% | +35.7% | +22.0% | +5.8% |
Evenly matched — BKR and WFRD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAL and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RES is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WFRD's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.87x | 0.83x | 1.25x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.46 | $57.20 | $70.41 | $112.22 | $8.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.22 | $31.64 | $35.83 | $42.58 | $4.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +97.9% | +96.3% | +96.8% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.8 | 61.4 | 67.2 | 63.5 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 16.2M | 9.0M | 1.4M | 2.2M |
Evenly matched — HAL and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAL and SLB and BKR and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAL as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", BKR as "Buy", WFRD as "Buy", RES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.2% upside for BKR (target: $72) vs -24.5% for WFRD (target: $82). For income investors, RES offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs WFRD's 0.91%.
| Metric | HALHalliburton Compa… | SLBSLB N.V. | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… | WFRDWeatherford Inter… | RESRPC, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.08 | $56.95 | $72.00 | $82.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 64 | 66 | 45 | 39 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +1.9% | +1.4% | +0.9% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.69 | $1.08 | $0.92 | $0.99 | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +2.9% | +0.6% | +1.3% | +0.2% |
Evenly matched — HAL and SLB and BKR and RES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
BKR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). RES leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HAL vs SLB vs BKR vs WFRD vs RES: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RPC, Inc.
(RES) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). Weatherford International plc (WFRD) offers the better valuation at 18. 3x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halliburton Company (HAL) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
On trailing P/E, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) is the cheapest at 18.
3x versus RPC, Inc. at 52. 0x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 18. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
Over the past 5 years, Weatherford International plc (WFRD) delivered a total return of +922.
1%, compared to +55. 1% for RPC, Inc. (RES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WFRD returned +350. 5% versus RES's -32. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPC, Inc.
(RES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Weatherford International plc's 1. 25β — meaning WFRD is approximately 131% more volatile than RES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPC, Inc. (RES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 103% for Weatherford International plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPC, Inc.
(RES) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -10. 8% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weatherford International plc grew EPS -12. 1% year-over-year, compared to -65. 1% for RPC, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus 2. 0% for RPC, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WFRD leads at 15. 4% versus 3. 5% for RES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKR leads at 23. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 18.
0x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for RPC, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKR: 6. 2% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RPC, Inc. (RES) offers the highest yield at 2. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Weatherford International plc (WFRD).
09Is HAL or SLB or BKR or WFRD or RES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +19. 1%, WFRD: +350. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HAL and SLB and BKR and WFRD and RES?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HAL: -0.3% · SLB: 5.0%)Net Margin>
%
(HAL: 6.9% · SLB: 9.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HAL: 27.8x · SLB: 23.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.