Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HBB vs SNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
HBB vs SNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $274M | $20.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $5.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 26.8% | 51.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.6% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $1.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $1.62B |
HBB vs SNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Beach Bran… (HBB) | 100 | 213.8 | +113.8% |
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 297.9 | +197.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBB vs SNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 20.2x)
- 2.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
- +44.5% vs SNA's +27.0%
SNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 174.8% 10Y total return vs HBB's -23.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.9% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 20.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs HBB's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs HBB's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs SNA's +27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs HBB's 7.4%, ROIC 18.1% vs 14.0% |
HBB vs SNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HBB vs SNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 8.6x HBB's $595M. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBB's 4.7%. On growth, SNA holds the edge at -2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $44M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.8% | +51.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HBB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, HBB trades at a 48% valuation discount to SNA's 20.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBB's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNA's 13.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $274M | $20.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $269M | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.47x | 20.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.76x | 20.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.33x | 13.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 3.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 3.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.84x | 20.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNA delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $16 for HBB. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBB's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNA scores 6/9 vs HBB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.4% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.0% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +18.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$298M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 48.61x | 27.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNA five years ago would be worth $16,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,277 for HBB. Over the past 12 months, HBB leads with a +44.5% total return vs SNA's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBB at 28.8% vs SNA's 16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.4% | +10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +27.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.7% | +57.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.8% | +68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +174.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBB's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.95x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.80 | $400.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.72 | $301.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.7% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 363K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HBB and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HBB as "Hold" and SNA as "Buy". For income investors, HBB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs SNA's 2.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $413.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $8.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +1.6% |
SNA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HBB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
HBB vs SNA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBB or SNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger pick with 0.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBB or SNA?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Snap-on Incorporated at 20. 1x. On forward P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBB or SNA?
Over the past 5 years, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) delivered a total return of +68.
6%, compared to +2. 8% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNA returned +174. 8% versus HBB's -23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBB or SNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company's 1. 95β — meaning HBB is approximately 165% more volatile than SNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 23% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBB or SNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is pulling ahead at 0.
9% versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Snap-on Incorporated grew EPS -1. 6% year-over-year, compared to -11. 4% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNA leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBB or SNA?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 4. 4% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus 6. 0% for HBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBB or SNA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) trades at 12.
8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Snap-on Incorporated — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBB or SNA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 2. 3% for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA).
09Is HBB or SNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 2. 3% yield, +174. 8% 10Y return). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNA: +174. 8%, HBB: -23. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBB and SNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBB (Consumer Cyclical) and SNA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.