Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HBB vs SNA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HBB
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$274M
5Y Perf.+113.8%
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated

Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.11B
5Y Perf.+197.9%

HBB vs SNA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HBB logoHBB
SNA logoSNA
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesManufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$274M$20.11B
Revenue (TTM)$595M$5.12B
Net Income (TTM)$28M$1.02B
Gross Margin26.8%51.3%
Operating Margin6.6%24.7%
Forward P/E12.8x20.2x
Total Debt$42M$1.33B
Cash & Equiv.$47M$1.62B

HBB vs SNALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HBB
SNA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hamilton Beach Bran… (HBB)100213.8+113.8%
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)100297.9+197.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HBB vs SNA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SNA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HBB
Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
The Value Play

HBB is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (12.8x vs 20.2x)
  • 2.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
  • +44.5% vs SNA's +27.0%
Best for: value and dividends
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
The Income Pick

SNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.3%
  • Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
  • 174.8% 10Y total return vs HBB's -23.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSNA logoSNA0.9% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3%
ValueHBB logoHBBLower P/E (12.8x vs 20.2x)
Quality / MarginsSNA logoSNA20.0% margin vs HBB's 4.7%
Stability / SafetySNA logoSNABeta 0.74 vs HBB's 1.95, lower leverage
DividendsHBB logoHBB2.3% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SNA's 2.3%
Momentum (1Y)HBB logoHBB+44.5% vs SNA's +27.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SNA logoSNA12.2% ROA vs HBB's 7.4%, ROIC 18.1% vs 14.0%

HBB vs SNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HBBHamilton Beach Brands Holding Company
FY 2025
Consumer Product
88.6%$532M
Commercial Product
10.0%$60M
Licensing
1.5%$9M
SNASnap-on Incorporated
FY 2025
Tools Group
38.1%$2.0B
Repair Systems And Information Group
36.4%$1.9B
Commercial And Industrial Group
28.3%$1.5B
Financial Services
8.0%$413M
Product And Services, Excluding Financial Services
-10.8%$-556,300,000

HBB vs SNA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSNALAGGINGHBB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 8.6x HBB's $595M. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBB's 4.7%. On growth, SNA holds the edge at -2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$595M$5.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$44M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$28M$1.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$8M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.8%+51.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.6%+24.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.7%+20.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.4%+21.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.6%-2.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+4.0%
SNA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HBB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, HBB trades at a 48% valuation discount to SNA's 20.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBB's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SNA's 13.9x.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Market CapShares × price$274M$20.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$269M$19.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.47x20.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.76x20.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.33x13.89x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.45x3.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.50x3.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.84x20.00x
HBB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

SNA delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $16 for HBB. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBB's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNA scores 6/9 vs HBB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.2%+17.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.4%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.0%+18.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.7%+18.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$298M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$47M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$42M$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense48.61x27.12x
SNA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SNA five years ago would be worth $16,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,277 for HBB. Over the past 12 months, HBB leads with a +44.5% total return vs SNA's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBB at 28.8% vs SNA's 16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.4%+10.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%+27.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+113.7%+57.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.8%+68.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-23.0%+174.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+28.8%+16.5%
HBB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SNA is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBB's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.95x0.74x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.80$400.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.72$301.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.7%+96.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.751.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K363K
SNA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HBB and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates HBB as "Hold" and SNA as "Buy". For income investors, HBB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs SNA's 2.26%.

MetricHBB logoHBBHamilton Beach Br…SNA logoSNASnap-on Incorpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$413.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts117
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises716
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.48$8.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.3%+1.6%
Evenly matched — HBB and SNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SNA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HBB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallSnap-on Incorporated (SNA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HBB vs SNA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HBB or SNA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger pick with 0.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HBB or SNA?

On trailing P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus Snap-on Incorporated at 20. 1x. On forward P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HBB or SNA?

Over the past 5 years, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) delivered a total return of +68.

6%, compared to +2. 8% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNA returned +174. 8% versus HBB's -23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HBB or SNA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

74β versus Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company's 1. 95β — meaning HBB is approximately 165% more volatile than SNA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 23% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HBB or SNA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is pulling ahead at 0.

9% versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Snap-on Incorporated grew EPS -1. 6% year-over-year, compared to -11. 4% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNA leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HBB or SNA?

Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.

7% net margin versus 4. 4% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus 6. 0% for HBB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HBB or SNA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) trades at 12.

8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Snap-on Incorporated — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HBB or SNA?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 2. 3% for Snap-on Incorporated (SNA).

09

Is HBB or SNA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

74), 2. 3% yield, +174. 8% 10Y return). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNA: +174. 8%, HBB: -23. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HBB and SNA?

These companies operate in different sectors (HBB (Consumer Cyclical) and SNA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HBB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SNA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HBB and SNA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HBB: -8.6% · SNA: -2.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(HBB: 4.7% · SNA: 20.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HBB: 10.5x · SNA: 20.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.