Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Communication Equipment
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $304M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $87M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $359M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-168M | $153M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | — | 65.4% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | — | 12.3% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $22M | $70M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $194M | $1.12B | $108M |
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard Bioscience,… (HBIO) | 100 | 25.7 | -74.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +126.3% vs ALKS's +16.5%
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ALKS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06 vs HBIO's 2.03, lower leverage
ITRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 8.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.0%
- 233.6% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- 6.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs HBIO's -65.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs HBIO's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +126.3% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 1 • HBIO leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBIO's -65.5%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $87M | $0 | $1.6B | $359M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$112M | $212M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$168M | $153M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | -$151M | $392M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.0% | — | +65.4% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | — | +12.3% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -65.5% | — | +9.8% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | — | +25.1% | +19.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | — | +28.2% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +91.5% | -4.1% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HBIO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 18% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ITRN's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HBIO's 62.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $304M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $331M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.30x | -0.76x | 24.76x | 20.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 17.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 62.25x | — | 17.25x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.51x | — | 4.00x | 3.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.95x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 5.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 54.08x | — | 12.28x | 20.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-4 for HBIO. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBIO's 2.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -130.2% | +8.8% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.3% | -89.0% | +5.4% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | — | +18.9% | +47.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | -145.7% | +14.2% | +29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.61x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $194M | $1.1B | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $22M | $70M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.13x | -189.82x | 32.30x | 32.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ITRN five years ago would be worth $28,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $925 for HBIO. Over the past 12 months, HBIO leads with a +126.3% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITRN at 45.2% vs HBIO's -51.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.1% | +4.9% | +25.3% | +42.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +126.3% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +76.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | +19.7% | +14.5% | +206.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.7% | -69.1% | +60.9% | +180.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -87.0% | -11.0% | +233.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.4% | +6.2% | +4.6% | +45.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBIO's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs HBIO's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.46 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $59.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.59 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $32.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 252K | 2.3M | 118K |
Analyst Outlook
ITRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBIO as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -11.6% for HBIO (target: $6). ITRN is the only dividend payer here at 3.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 28 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.2% |
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
HBIO vs DBVT vs ALKS vs ITRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the stronger pick with 6. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
Over the past 5 years, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to -90. 7% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITRN returned +233. 6% versus DBVT's -87. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus Harvard Bioscience, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning HBIO is approximately 92% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is pulling ahead at 6. 8% versus -8. 1% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. grew EPS 8. 1% year-over-year, compared to -357. 1% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -65. 5% for Harvard Bioscience, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus -0. 7% for HBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. HBIO, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HBIO or DBVT or ALKS or ITRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), 3. 2% yield, +233. 6% 10Y return). Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (HBIO) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITRN: +233. 6%, HBIO: -76. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBIO and DBVT and ALKS and ITRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBIO (Healthcare) and DBVT (Healthcare) and ALKS (Healthcare) and ITRN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ITRN pays a dividend while HBIO, DBVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.