Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HBNC vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
HBNC vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $28.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | -25.0% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | -203.2% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $404M | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $798M |
HBNC vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Bancorp, In… (HBNC) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBNC vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 128.4% 10Y total return vs FISV's 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.14x
- 2.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
FISV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 1.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 9.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs HBNC's -154.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs HBNC's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs FISV's -68.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs HBNC's -2.2%, ROIC 8.1% vs -9.3% |
HBNC vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBNC vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 219.5x HBNC's $96M. FISV is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBNC's -154.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.3% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $28.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $57.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | 8.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.40x | 6.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.29x | 6.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FISV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FISV delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-15 for HBNC. HBNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FISV scores 5/9 vs HBNC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $338M | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $404M | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBNC five years ago would be worth $12,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,929 for FISV. Over the past 12 months, HBNC leads with a +34.7% total return vs FISV's -68.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBNC at 27.5% vs FISV's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | -68.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | -54.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | -50.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.4% | +1.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBNC and FISV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FISV is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBNC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBNC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 30.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $177.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.34 | $51.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +30.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 40.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 5.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HBNC as "Buy" and FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.3% upside for FISV (target: $71) vs 3.8% for HBNC (target: $21). HBNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $71.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +20.5% |
FISV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HBNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
HBNC vs FISV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBNC or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBNC or FISV?
On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBNC or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
(HBNC) delivered a total return of +27. 7%, compared to -50. 7% for Fiserv, Inc. (FISV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBNC returned +128. 4% versus FISV's +1. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBNC or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Horizon Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning HBNC is approximately 11% more volatile than FISV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBNC or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fiserv, Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -493. 8% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBNC or FISV?
Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -145. 9% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus -193. 4% for HBNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBNC or FISV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FISV: 32. 3% to $71. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBNC or FISV?
In this comparison, HBNC (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HBNC or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
(HBNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97), 2. 1% yield, +128. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HBNC: +128. 4%, FISV: +1. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBNC and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBNC (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. HBNC pays a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.