Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Telecommunications Services
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $225M | $89M | $1M | $1.38B | $10.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $251M | $51M | $36M | $452M | $262M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-6M | $-7M | $21M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 43.6% | 14.9% | 29.5% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | -14.6% | -15.7% | 3.6% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | — | — | 37.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $9M | $10M | $11M | $542M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $7M | $2M | $169M | $391M |
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Technologies… (HDSN) | 100 | 595.5 | +495.5% |
| Airgain, Inc. (AIRG) | 100 | 80.3 | -19.7% |
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1826.9 | +1726.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HDSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 3.26x
- Beta 1.45, current ratio 3.26x
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 37.7x)
- 5.7% margin vs TAOP's -19.6%
AIRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, TAOP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GILT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
GSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 0.1%
- 201.8% 10Y total return vs GILT's 358.8%
- 0.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +305.2% vs TAOP's -78.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs TAOP's -19.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs TAOP's -78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 7.1% vs -27.1% |
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GSAT leads in 2 of 6 categories
HDSN leads 1 • AIRG leads 0 • TAOP leads 0 • GILT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HDSN and GSAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILT is the larger business by revenue, generating $452M annually — 12.5x TAOP's $36M. HDSN is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAOP's -19.6%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $251M | $51M | $36M | $452M | $262M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$6M | -$4M | $40M | $93M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$6M | -$7M | $21M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$1M | -$3M | $10M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +43.6% | +14.9% | +29.5% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | -14.6% | -15.7% | +3.6% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -11.5% | -19.6% | +4.6% | -19.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -2.4% | -8.1% | +2.2% | +57.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.7% | -4.2% | -2.6% | +75.3% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.3% | +38.5% | -51.7% | -38.1% | -121.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HDSN and TAOP and GSAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, HDSN trades at a 74% valuation discount to GILT's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HDSN's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $89M | $1M | $1.4B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $90M | $9M | $1.2B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.32x | -13.43x | -0.16x | 55.41x | -138.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.71x | — | — | 37.68x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | — | — | 27.81x | 119.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 1.71x | 0.04x | 3.05x | 41.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 3.03x | 0.08x | 2.27x | 28.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 150.06x | 57.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HDSN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HDSN delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-47 for TAOP. HDSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GSAT scores 5/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -20.4% | -46.7% | +4.1% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | -13.1% | -21.7% | +2.8% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | -22.8% | -27.1% | +5.7% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | -25.2% | -38.0% | +4.7% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.30x | 0.50x | 0.02x | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | $1M | $8M | -$158M | $151M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $7M | $2M | $169M | $391M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $9M | $10M | $11M | $542M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.24x | — | -52.63x | 5.18x | -0.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.1% | +77.7% | -6.8% | +40.5% | +27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.0% | +78.6% | -78.3% | +186.3% | +305.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.8% | +25.9% | -99.3% | +247.0% | +484.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.4% | -66.3% | -99.9% | +95.0% | +393.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.6% | -9.4% | -99.9% | +358.8% | +201.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.0% | +8.0% | -80.9% | +51.4% | +80.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIRG and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRG is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.29x | 2.30x | 2.09x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.52 | $7.39 | $20.10 | $20.56 | $82.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.21 | $3.00 | $1.18 | $5.43 | $17.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +98.1% | +6.4% | +91.6% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 73.3 | 53.1 | 63.1 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 337K | 90K | 20K | 650K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
GSAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HDSN as "Hold", GILT as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.5% upside for HDSN (target: $10) vs -62.8% for GILT (target: $7). GSAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.67 | — | — | $7.00 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | — | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GSAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). HDSN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HDSN vs AIRG vs TAOP vs GILT vs GSAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
On trailing P/E, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Hudson Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +358. 8% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 695% more volatile than AIRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudson Technologies, Inc. (HDSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 151% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Airgain, Inc. grew EPS 31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 8% net margin versus -32. 7% for Taoping Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HDSN leads at 7. 5% versus -29. 0% for TAOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hudson Technologies, Inc.
(HDSN) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. — 26. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HDSN: 82. 5% to $9. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT?
In this comparison, GSAT (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HDSN, AIRG, TAOP, GILT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HDSN or AIRG or TAOP or GILT or GSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIRG: -9. 4%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HDSN and AIRG and TAOP and GILT and GSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HDSN (Basic Materials) and AIRG (Technology) and TAOP (Technology) and GILT (Technology) and GSAT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HDSN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AIRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.