Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Industrial - Machinery
Security & Protection Services
Construction
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Security & Protection Services | Industrial - Machinery | Security & Protection Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $3M | $293M | $277M | $11.55B | $14.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $159M | $364M | $4.16B | $7.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-535K | $20M | $27M | $634M | $837M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 31.1% | 28.2% | 45.0% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -21.6% | 15.0% | 4.3% | 20.6% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 32.5x | 88.0x | 26.3x | 15.3x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $810K | $0.00 | $49M | $2.28B | $3.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $54M | $16M | $356M | $647M |
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 40.8 | -59.2% |
| CompX International… (CIX) | 100 | 168.8 | +68.8% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 350.3 | +250.3% |
| Allegion plc (ALLE) | 100 | 134.8 | +34.8% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIHO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.3%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 111.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- 17.3% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
CIX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 223.2% 10Y total return vs MAS's 151.5%
- Beta 0.56, yield 9.3%, current ratio 5.87x
- Beta 0.56 vs MAS's 1.28
TWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +161.3% vs HIHO's -56.5%
ALLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.90 vs CIX's 6.40
- Lower P/E (15.3x vs 16.8x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.38
- 15.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
MAS is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 15.9% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs -31.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 16.8x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.2% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs MAS's 1.28 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, vs MAS's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +161.3% vs HIHO's -56.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.9% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 35.4% vs -31.7% |
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories
HIHO leads 1 • MAS leads 1 • TWIN leads 1 • CIX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALLE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.7B annually — 1250.0x HIHO's $6M. ALLE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, TWIN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $159M | $364M | $4.2B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$653,000 | $26M | $30M | $959M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$535,000 | $20M | $27M | $634M | $837M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $22M | $774,000 | $704M | $943M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +31.1% | +28.2% | +45.0% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | +15.0% | +4.3% | +20.6% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +12.7% | +7.3% | +15.2% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +13.9% | +0.2% | +16.9% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | +0.7% | +19.0% | +9.7% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +14.3% | +3.1% | -7.0% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, CIX trades at a 54% valuation discount to HIHO's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALLE offers better value at 1.06x vs MAS's 3.75x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $293M | $277M | $11.5B | $14.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $239M | $310M | $13.5B | $17.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.49x | 15.03x | -137.36x | 18.06x | 18.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 87.96x | 26.34x | 15.33x | 16.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.09x | — | 1.06x | 3.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -23.17x | 9.09x | 12.52x | 13.62x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 1.85x | 0.81x | 2.84x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 2.11x | 1.62x | 5.62x | 200.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.30x | 31.44x | 16.84x | 16.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIHO scores 6/9 vs TWIN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | +14.3% | +15.3% | +32.1% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +12.8% | +7.1% | +12.3% | +15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | +20.0% | +3.9% | +18.1% | +35.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +20.8% | +35.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | — | 0.30x | 1.10x | 45.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$54M | $33M | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $54M | $16M | $356M | $647M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $810,000 | $0 | $49M | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 6.79x | 8.61x | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWIN five years ago would be worth $15,641 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,274 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +161.3% total return vs HIHO's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWIN at 17.5% vs HIHO's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.8% | +4.6% | +19.0% | -16.2% | +11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | -3.1% | +161.3% | -3.2% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.0% | +56.6% | +62.1% | +30.3% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | +49.8% | +56.4% | +0.6% | +15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +223.2% | +95.3% | +123.6% | +151.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +16.1% | +17.5% | +9.2% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIX and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CIX is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAS's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.56x | 1.16x | 0.66x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.21 | $32.30 | $19.67 | $183.11 | $79.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $20.29 | $6.90 | $131.25 | $58.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.4% | +73.5% | +97.8% | +73.4% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 53.3 | 59.9 | 41.5 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 3K | 50K | 886K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and ALLE and MAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWIN as "Hold", ALLE as "Hold", MAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for ALLE (target: $173) vs 15.1% for MAS (target: $83). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.27% vs TWIN's 0.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $172.50 | $82.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 4 | 23 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +9.3% | +0.9% | +1.5% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $2.20 | $0.16 | $2.03 | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +3.9% |
ALLE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HIHO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HIHO vs CIX vs TWIN vs ALLE vs MAS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). CompX International Inc. (CIX) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (88. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
On trailing P/E, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Allegion plc is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allegion plc wins at 0. 90x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
Over the past 5 years, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) delivered a total return of +56.
4%, compared to -57. 3% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIX returned +223. 2% versus HIHO's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Masco Corporation's 1. 28β — meaning MAS is approximately 128% more volatile than CIX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
8% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALLE leads at 21. 1% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLE leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allegion plc (ALLE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus CompX International Inc. 's 6. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allegion plc (ALLE) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for CompX International Inc. — 72. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLE: 28. 4% to $172. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 0. 9% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).
09Is HIHO or CIX or TWIN or ALLE or MAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CompX International Inc.
(CIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), 9. 3% yield, +223. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIX: +223. 2%, MAS: +151. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIHO and CIX and TWIN and ALLE and MAS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALLE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.