HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-59.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$765M
5Y Perf.+300.0%
ACCO
ACCO Brands Corporation
Business Equipment & Supplies
Market Cap$373M
5Y Perf.-34.7%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$299M
5Y Perf.+462.3%
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HIHO | LYTS | ACCO | FLXS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $3M | $765M | $373M | $299M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $592M | $1.55B | $458M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-535K | $26M | $74M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 25.3% | 30.7% | 23.2% |
| Operating Margin | -21.6% | 6.5% | 7.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 32.5x | 22.5x | 4.6x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $810K | $67M | $921M | $59M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $3M | $64M | $40M |
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HIHO
LYTS
ACCO
FLXS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 40.8 | -59.2% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 562.3 | +462.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HIHO and ACCO are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. ACCO Brands Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. FLXS and LYTS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HIHO
Highway Holdings Limited
The Income Pick
HIHO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 14.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64, yield 14.3%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.64 vs FLXS's 1.45, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
The Growth Play
LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 109.6% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 53.0%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ACCO
ACCO Brands Corporation
The Value Play
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 11.8x)
- 4.8% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
Best for: value and quality
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
FLXS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5%
- 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LYTS | 22.1% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% |
| Value | ACCO | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 11.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | ACCO | 4.8% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% |
| Stability / Safety | HIHO | Beta 0.64 vs FLXS's 1.45, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HIHO | 14.3% yield, vs LYTS's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLXS | +77.1% vs HIHO's -56.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLXS | 7.5% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 9.9% vs -31.7% |
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2023
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLACCOLAGGINGLYTS
Who Leads Where
ACCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 2 • HIHO leads 0 • LYTS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓LYTSLSI Industries Inc.
0leads
HIHOHighway Holdings Limi…
0leads
FLXSFlexsteel Industries,…
2leads
ACCOACCO Brands Corporati…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLXSvs HIHOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ACCO4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ACCO4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLXS5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLXS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 252.5x HIHO's $6M. ACCO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $592M | $1.6B | $458M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$653,000 | $51M | $177M | $31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$535,000 | $26M | $74M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $38M | $49M | $28M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +25.3% | +30.7% | +23.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | +6.5% | +7.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +4.3% | +4.8% | +4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +6.4% | +3.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | -0.5% | +8.3% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +11.1% | +2.4% | -27.2% |
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 72% valuation discount to HIHO's 32.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACCO's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYTS's 17.1x.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $765M | $373M | $299M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $828M | $1.2B | $318M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.49x | 31.09x | 9.18x | 15.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.46x | 4.64x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.83x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -23.17x | 17.12x | 6.79x | 10.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 1.33x | 0.24x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 3.28x | 0.57x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.07x | 7.34x | 8.85x |
ACCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACCO's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LYTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | +10.9% | +11.3% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +6.5% | +3.2% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | +9.5% | +5.5% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +12.6% | +6.1% | +12.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.29x | 1.39x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $63M | $856M | $19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $3M | $64M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $810,000 | $67M | $921M | $59M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 13.52x | 2.50x | 380.21x |
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,274 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.1% total return vs HIHO's -56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.3% vs HIHO's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.8% | +33.5% | +11.5% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.5% | +53.9% | +16.7% | +77.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.0% | +101.1% | -4.8% | +246.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.3% | +227.7% | -39.3% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | +109.6% | -35.3% | +53.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.6% | +26.2% | -1.6% | +51.3% |
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 35.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.40x | 1.35x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.21 | $24.75 | $4.29 | $59.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $15.31 | $2.81 | $29.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.4% | +99.2% | +94.2% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 70.7 | 74.9 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 375K | 1.2M | 47K |
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", ACCO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs -3.3% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.27% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | HIHOHighway Holdings … | LYTSLSI Industries In… | ACCOACCO Brands Corpo… | FLXSFlexsteel Industr… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $8.00 | $54.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.3% | +0.8% | +7.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $0.19 | $0.29 | $0.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.9% |
Evenly matched — HIHO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ACCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FLXS leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HIHO vs LYTS vs ACCO vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Highway Holdings Limited at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -57. 3% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYTS returned +109. 6% versus HIHO's -41. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning FLXS is approximately 126% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for LSI Industries Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 1. 4% for Highway Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACCO leads at 7. 1% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIHO leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4.
6x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for LSI Industries Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 98. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 0. 8% for LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS).
09Is HIHO or LYTS or ACCO or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 14. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 3%, FLXS: +53. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIHO and LYTS and ACCO and FLXS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HIHO (Industrials) and LYTS (Technology) and ACCO (Industrials) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HIHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HIHO: -44.3% · LYTS: -0.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HIHO: 32.5x · LYTS: 31.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.