Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HIHO vs TWIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
HIHO vs TWIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $3M | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $348M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-535K | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 27.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.6% | 3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 33.0x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $810K | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $16M |
HIHO vs TWIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highway Holdings Li… (HIHO) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIHO vs TWIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIHO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 14.1%
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 111.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -15.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 12.9%, current ratio 2.79x
TWIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 87.2% 10Y total return vs HIHO's -41.1%
- Lower P/E (25.2x vs 33.0x)
- 6.3% margin vs HIHO's -8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% revenue growth vs TWIN's 15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.2x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs HIHO's -8.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs TWIN's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.1% yield, vs TWIN's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs HIHO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs HIHO's -6.4%, ROIC 3.9% vs -31.7% |
HIHO vs TWIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIHO vs TWIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $348M annually — 56.7x HIHO's $6M. TWIN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HIHO's -8.7%. On growth, TWIN holds the edge at +0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $348M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$653,000 | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$535,000 | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$70,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +27.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.6% | +3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +22.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HIHO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $299M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.99x | -131.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -22.47x | 12.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 1.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HIHO and TWIN each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TWIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HIHO. HIHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWIN's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIHO scores 6/9 vs TWIN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.0% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.7% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $33M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $810,000 | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TWIN five years ago would be worth $14,753 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,296 for HIHO. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs HIHO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWIN at 15.8% vs HIHO's -18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.0% | +13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.2% | +156.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.4% | +55.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | +47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | +87.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.3% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HIHO and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWIN's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs HIHO's 36.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.21 | $19.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $6.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.0% | +93.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 49K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIHO and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HIHO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.06% vs TWIN's 0.90%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.1% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $0.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
TWIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HIHO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HIHO vs TWIN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIHO or TWIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger pick with 17.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 5% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN). Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HIHO or TWIN?
Over the past 5 years, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) delivered a total return of +47.
5%, compared to -57. 0% for Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWIN returned +87. 2% versus HIHO's -41. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HIHO or TWIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Twin Disc, Incorporated's 1. 04β — meaning TWIN is approximately 50% more volatile than HIHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 30% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HIHO or TWIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is pulling ahead at 17.
3% versus 15. 5% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highway Holdings Limited grew EPS 111. 0% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HIHO or TWIN?
Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 1. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWIN leads at 2. 9% versus -7. 2% for HIHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIHO leads at 33. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HIHO or TWIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).
07Is HIHO or TWIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highway Holdings Limited (HIHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 14. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIHO: -41. 1%, TWIN: +87. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HIHO and TWIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.