Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HKPD
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-68.0%
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-50.6%
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-58.8%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-41.9%

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HKPD logoHKPD
ATXG logoATXG
CNET logoCNET
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsIntegrated Freight & LogisticsAdvertising AgenciesFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$7M$3M$2M$589M
Revenue (TTM)$20M$4M$6M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-27K$-7M$-2M$137M
Gross Margin11.9%14.7%4.8%61.9%
Operating Margin0.7%-49.4%-31.7%16.8%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$2M$22M$122K$14M
Cash & Equiv.$749K$325K$812K$95M

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HKPD
ATXG
CNET
BTBT
StockJan 25May 26Return
Hong Kong Pharma Di… (HKPD)10032.0-68.0%
Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG)10049.4-50.6%
ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET)10041.2-58.8%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10058.1-41.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Addentax Group Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. CNET also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HKPD
Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited
The Growth Angle

HKPD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
The Defensive Pick

ATXG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.54x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: defensive
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Income Pick

CNET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.57x
  • Beta 1.18 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • -60.4% 10Y total return vs HKPD's -77.3%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
  • 17.3% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
ValueATXG logoATXGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
Stability / SafetyCNET logoCNETBeta 1.18 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BTBT logoBTBT-9.0% vs CNET's -55.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -64.7%

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HKPDHong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Supply Chain Services Member
100.0%$12M
ATXGAddentax Group Corp.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$4M
CNETZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
FY 2024
Search Engine Marketing and Data Service
67.5%$10M
Online Advertising Placement
32.5%$5M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGCNET

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 44.2x ATXG's $4M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, HKPD holds the edge at -4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$20M$4M$6M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$947,630-$2M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$2M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M-$2M-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.9%+14.7%+4.8%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.7%-49.4%-31.7%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.1%-2.0%-33.4%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+2.0%-34.3%-27.3%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.7%-7.9%-47.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-176.5%-136.8%+95.7%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — HKPD and ATXG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, HKPD's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7M$3M$2M$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$25M$1M$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-213.33x-0.38x-0.38x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.19x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.35x0.67x0.12x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.31x0.09x0.38x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.00x4.56x
Evenly matched — HKPD and ATXG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs ATXG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.6%-31.7%-60.3%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.3%-19.4%-21.3%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.6%-2.9%-64.7%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%-3.9%-73.5%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94456
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x1.03x0.03x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$22M-$690,000-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$748,721$324,953$812,000$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$22M$122,000$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.35x-3.67x
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HKPD five years ago would be worth $2,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs CNET's -55.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -7.1% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.7%-13.9%-44.4%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.3%-53.4%-55.1%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.3%-95.9%-89.0%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.3%-99.6%-97.9%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.3%-99.9%-97.8%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-39.0%-65.4%-52.1%-7.1%
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CNET and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNET is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs ATXG's 17.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.66x1.44x1.18x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.76$27.90$2.78$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.37$0.37$0.57$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+23.2%+17.5%+25.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.644.650.769.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded24K157K11K18.5M
Evenly matched — CNET and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHKPD logoHKPDHong Kong Pharma …ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HKPD vs ATXG vs CNET vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) delivered a total return of -77.

3%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

(CNET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 186% more volatile than CNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATXG leads at -30. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. HKPD, ATXG, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is HKPD or ATXG or CNET or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

(CNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNET: -97. 8%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between HKPD and ATXG and CNET and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (HKPD (Industrials) and ATXG (Industrials) and CNET (Communication Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HKPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HKPD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNET

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HKPD and ATXG and CNET and BTBT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HKPD: -4.7% · ATXG: -7.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.