Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HKPD vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
HKPD vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $7M | $622M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27K | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $749K | $95M |
HKPD vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Pharma Di… (HKPD) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKPD vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HKPD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.66
- Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 1.66, current ratio 2.99x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -58.2% 10Y total return vs HKPD's -77.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs HKPD's 21.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs HKPD's 21.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs HKPD's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.66 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.0% vs HKPD's -27.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs HKPD's -0.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs 1.6% |
HKPD vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HKPD vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 8.1x HKPD's $20M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HKPD's -0.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.5% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
HKPD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HKPD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 9.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $622M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $540M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -216.63x | 9.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.28x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 3.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.26x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HKPD. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HKPD's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs HKPD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,721 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HKPD five years ago would be worth $2,305 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,660 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -4.0% total return vs HKPD's -27.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -5.4% vs HKPD's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | -5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.8% | -4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | -15.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | -83.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | -58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | -5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HKPD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HKPD is the less volatile stock with a 1.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 42.4% from its 52-week high vs HKPD's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.76 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +42.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HKPD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HKPD vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKPD or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HKPD or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) delivered a total return of -77.
0%, compared to -83. 4% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -58. 2% versus HKPD's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HKPD or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
66β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 103% more volatile than HKPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 48% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HKPD or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 21. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -101. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HKPD or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -0. 1% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus 0. 7% for HKPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HKPD or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. HKPD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HKPD or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HKPD: -77. 0%, BTBT: -58. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HKPD and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKPD (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.