Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HL vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
HL vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $12.13B | $125.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.57B | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $559M | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 44.1% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $299M | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $7.65B |
HL vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HL vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs NEM's 293.1%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs NEM's 19.1%
NEM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 0.75, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs NEM's 19.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs NEM's 30.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs HL's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs NEM's +112.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs NEM's 9.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs 24.9% |
HL vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HL vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 11.0x HL's $1.6B. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEM's 30.5%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $853M | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $559M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $472M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.6% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.4% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NEM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.7x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 52% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NEM's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.1B | $125.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $118.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 36.92x | 17.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.07x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.25x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.53x | 5.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.58x | 3.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.11x | 17.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $16 for NEM. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs HL's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.5% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.3% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $299M | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.04x | 50.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,998 for NEM. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs NEM's +112.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs NEM's 34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +271.0% | +112.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.9% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.3% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +360.6% | +293.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.4% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.17 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.68 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.9% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.4M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HL as "Hold" and NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs 21.2% for NEM (target: $138). NEM is the only dividend payer here at 0.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.83 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.8% |
NEM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HL leads in 1 (Total Returns).
HL vs NEM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HL or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmont Corporation (NEM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HL or NEM?
On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.
7x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HL or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to +80. 0% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HL or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Hecla Mining Company's 1. 26β — meaning HL is approximately 67% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HL or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 19. 1% for Newmont Corporation (NEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 124. 1% for Newmont Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HL or NEM?
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
1% net margin versus 22. 6% for Hecla Mining Company — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 37. 5% for HL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HL or NEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10.
9x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — HL or NEM?
In this comparison, NEM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HL or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HL and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NEM pays a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.