Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HMR vs TEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
HMR vs TEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $49M | $1.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $779M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 52.1% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 27.0% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $348M |
HMR vs TEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidmar Maritime Ho… (HMR) | 100 | 37.5 | -62.5% |
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 276.7 | +176.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HMR vs TEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 27.8%, current ratio 1.54x
TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -9.6%, EPS growth -44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- 77.4% 10Y total return vs HMR's -85.6%
- Beta 0.33, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -9.6% revenue growth vs HMR's -41.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.1% margin vs HMR's -42.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs HMR's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.4% vs HMR's -62.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs HMR's -32.5%, ROIC 6.9% vs 41.5% |
HMR vs TEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HMR vs TEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HMR and TEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $779M annually — 17.9x HMR's $44M. TEN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HMR's -42.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $779M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $327M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$503M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.1% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +27.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -42.6% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | -64.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -71.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.7x trailing earnings, TEN trades at a 66% valuation discount to HMR's 25.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TEN's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HMR's 8.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.54x | 8.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.17x | 6.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.69x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.68x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.53x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TEN delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-104 for HMR. HMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEN's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HMR scores 6/9 vs TEN's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.7% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.5% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +41.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.1% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.13x | 2.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $51,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,438 for HMR. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +163.4% total return vs HMR's -62.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.9% vs HMR's -47.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.2% | +103.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.6% | +163.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +191.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +415.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.6% | +77.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.6% | +42.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HMR's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEN currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs HMR's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.86 | $44.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $17.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.9% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 96K | 499K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
TEN is the only dividend payer here at 5.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HMR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HMR vs TEN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HMR or TEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -41. 0% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the better valuation at 8. 7x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HMR or TEN?
On trailing P/E, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the cheapest at 8.
7x versus Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. at 25. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HMR or TEN?
Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +415.
4%, compared to -85. 6% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEN returned +77. 4% versus HMR's -85. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HMR or TEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 0. 80β — meaning HMR is approximately 139% more volatile than TEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HMR or TEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.
6% versus -41. 0% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited grew EPS -44. 4% year-over-year, compared to -90. 1% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HMR leads at 82. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HMR or TEN?
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
9% net margin versus 6. 6% for Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEN leads at 34. 6% versus 14. 1% for HMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HMR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HMR or TEN?
In this comparison, TEN (5.
5% yield) pays a dividend. HMR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HMR or TEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEN: +77. 4%, HMR: -85. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HMR and TEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (HMR (Industrials) and TEN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. TEN pays a dividend while HMR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.