Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HOFT vs MLKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HOFT vs MLKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $138M | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $1.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $194M |
HOFT vs MLKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hooker Furnishings … (HOFT) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOFT vs MLKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 7.3%
- -20.5% 10Y total return vs MLKN's -23.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 3.53x
MLKN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth -147.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
- -0.7% margin vs HOFT's -3.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.7% margin vs HOFT's -3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs MLKN's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs MLKN's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.7% vs MLKN's +6.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 1.3% vs -5.1% |
HOFT vs MLKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HOFT vs MLKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 10.0x HOFT's $376M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.7% (MLKN) to -3.4% (HOFT). On growth, MLKN holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | -0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.6% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | -75.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MLKN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $138M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $202M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.72x | -30.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.66x | 0.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MLKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MLKN delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-7 for HOFT. HOFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MLKN scores 5/9 vs HOFT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.6% | -1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 1.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $64M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.29x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HOFT and MLKN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MLKN five years ago would be worth $4,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,329 for HOFT. Over the past 12 months, HOFT leads with a +57.7% total return vs MLKN's +6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MLKN at 3.6% vs HOFT's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | -9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.7% | +6.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +11.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -53.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | -23.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +3.6% |
Risk & Volatility
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MLKN's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOFT currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs MLKN's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.99 | $23.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.46 | $13.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 845K |
Analyst Outlook
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HOFT as "Buy" and MLKN as "Hold". For income investors, HOFT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.28% vs MLKN's 4.58%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% |
MLKN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HOFT leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HOFT vs MLKN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOFT or MLKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). Analysts rate Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOFT or MLKN?
Over the past 5 years, MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) delivered a total return of -53. 9%, compared to -56. 7% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOFT returned -20. 5% versus MLKN's -23. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOFT or MLKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
73β versus MillerKnoll, Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning MLKN is approximately 132% more volatile than HOFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HOFT or MLKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MillerKnoll, Inc. grew EPS -147. 7% year-over-year, compared to -236. 4% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MLKN leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HOFT or MLKN?
MillerKnoll, Inc.
(MLKN) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 0% net margin versus -3. 1% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation — meaning it keeps -1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MLKN leads at 1. 4% versus -4. 6% for HOFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MLKN leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HOFT or MLKN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) offers the highest yield at 7. 3%, versus 4. 6% for MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN).
07Is HOFT or MLKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
73), 7. 3% yield). MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFT: -20. 5%, MLKN: -23. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HOFT and MLKN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.