Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HP vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
HP vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $3.98B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.09B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-316M | $-410M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.32B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $224M | $98M |
HP vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helmerich & Payne, … (HP) | 100 | 155.4 | +55.4% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 138.4 | +38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HP vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 82.0%, current ratio 1.80x
- Beta 0.87, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.80x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs HP's -2.5%
- -5.1% margin vs HP's -7.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.9% revenue growth vs SOC's 35.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.1% margin vs HP's -7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +112.5% vs SOC's -32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs SOC's -24.4%, ROIC 3.7% vs -44.6% |
HP vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HP vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HP and SOC operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $689M | -$395M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$316M | -$410M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $180M | -$640M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | -138.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.99x | -3.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.08x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 2464.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.11x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HP leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HP delivers a -11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-102 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HP scores 3/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.0% | -102.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | -24.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $224M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.11x | -3.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HP five years ago would be worth $16,356 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,825 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, HP leads with a +112.5% total return vs SOC's -32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HP at 11.4% vs SOC's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.9% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +112.5% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | +32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.6% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +38.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.4% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HP is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HP currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 38.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.68 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.65 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +38.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HP as "Hold" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -7.5% for HP (target: $37). HP is the only dividend payer here at 2.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.86 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
HP vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HP or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HP or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) delivered a total return of +63. 6%, compared to +38. 2% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +38. 2% versus HP's -2. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HP or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 73% more volatile than HP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — HP or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -148. 4% for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HP or SOC?
Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Helmerich & Payne, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HP leads at 6. 2% versus 0. 0% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HP leads at 14. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HP or SOC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 101.
3% to $27. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — HP or SOC?
In this comparison, HP (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HP or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
(HP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 2. 5% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HP: -2. 5%, SOC: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HP and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HP is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HP pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.