Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Regulated Water
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $735M | $48M | $2.34B | $6.87B | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $771M | $165M | $4.71B | $3.36B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-145M | $12M | $638M | $483M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 16.7% | 72.8% | 43.9% | 102.0% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | -4.0% | 31.1% | 34.3% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 44.8x | 12.6x | 6.8x | 7.8x | 35.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.19B | $23M | $4.49B | $3.55B | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $162M | $28M | $76M | $79M | $18M |
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HighPeak Energy, In… (HPK) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 49.9 | -50.1% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 704.8 | +604.8% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 282.8 | +182.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HPK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 74.9%, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.17, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.13x
- Beta 0.17 vs WTTR's 1.07
BATL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MTDR's 2.4%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs HPK's -19.3%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 35.1x)
- 4.2% ROA vs HPK's -4.5%, ROIC 10.8% vs 4.3%
MTDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 202.1% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.5%
- 14.4% margin vs HPK's -18.8%
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +121.2% vs HPK's -31.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs HPK's -19.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 35.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs HPK's -18.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs WTTR's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MTDR's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.2% vs HPK's -31.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs HPK's -4.5%, ROIC 10.8% vs 4.3% |
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTDR leads in 1 of 6 categories
BATL leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • HPK leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTDR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 28.5x BATL's $165M. MTDR is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HPK's -18.8%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $771M | $165M | $4.7B | $3.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $522M | $74M | $3.4B | $2.4B | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$145M | $12M | $638M | $483M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $39M | $934M | $59M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +72.8% | +43.9% | +102.0% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -4.0% | +31.1% | +34.3% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.8% | +7.2% | +13.6% | +14.4% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +23.7% | +19.8% | +1.8% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.1% | -37.0% | -8.1% | -33.2% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.5% | +59.0% | -33.9% | -115.1% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BATL and CIVI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 96% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WTTR's 10.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $735M | $48M | $2.3B | $6.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $43M | $6.8B | $10.3B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.77x | -1.29x | 3.24x | 9.07x | 84.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.57x | 6.75x | 7.78x | 35.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.08x | — | 1.89x | 4.32x | 10.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 0.29x | 0.45x | 1.88x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | — | 0.41x | 1.15x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.22x | 2.61x | 28.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-9 for HPK. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HPK's 0.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.1% | +14.5% | +9.5% | +8.2% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | +2.4% | +4.2% | +4.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | -3.4% | +10.8% | +10.5% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.1% | -1.8% | +12.1% | +11.5% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | — | 0.68x | 0.59x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | -$5M | $4.4B | $3.5B | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $162M | $28M | $76M | $79M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $23M | $4.5B | $3.5B | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.71x | 0.57x | 2.80x | 5.53x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $27,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,254 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +121.2% total return vs HPK's -31.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 33.1% vs HPK's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.2% | +142.9% | -1.5% | +29.2% | +52.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.8% | +120.6% | +5.5% | +33.6% | +121.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -53.8% | -41.7% | +30.1% | +135.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.1% | -77.5% | +23.5% | +111.4% | +179.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.3% | -71.8% | -86.2% | +202.1% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -22.7% | -16.5% | +9.2% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BATL and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | -1.92x | 1.06x | -0.05x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $29.70 | $37.45 | $66.84 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.85 | $1.00 | $25.38 | $37.14 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.5% | +9.7% | +73.1% | +82.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 37.1 | 54.8 | 39.1 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 16.6M | 22.4M | 1.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BATL and MTDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HPK as "Buy", BATL as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", MTDR as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 106.2% upside for HPK (target: $12) vs 13.2% for CIVI (target: $31). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WTTR's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | — | $31.00 | $68.29 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 2 | 16 | 42 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +100.0% | +18.2% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $2.96 | $4.98 | $1.31 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% | +0.8% | +0.4% |
MTDR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BATL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HPK vs BATL vs CIVI vs MTDR vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 0x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +179. 2%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +202. 1% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
92β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning WTTR is approximately -156% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 75% for HighPeak Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -19. 3% for HighPeak Energy, Inc. (HPK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Battalion Oil Corporation grew EPS 42. 6% year-over-year, compared to -80. 6% for HighPeak Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
8% net margin versus 1. 5% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTDR leads at 32. 5% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 28. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HPK: 106. 2% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 9% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR).
09Is HPK or BATL or CIVI or MTDR or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
92), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -71. 8%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HPK and BATL and CIVI and MTDR and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (HPK (Energy) and BATL (Energy) and CIVI (Energy) and MTDR (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HPK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.