Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HROW
Harrow Health, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.45B
5Y Perf.+621.8%
ICUI
ICU Medical, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08B
5Y Perf.-38.3%
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-41.9%
MCK
McKesson Corporation

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$92.15B
5Y Perf.+374.1%
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.

Medical - Distribution

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$43.59B
5Y Perf.+238.7%

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HROW logoHROW
ICUI logoICUI
ATRC logoATRC
MCK logoMCK
CAH logoCAH
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - DistributionMedical - Distribution
Market Cap$1.45B$3.08B$1.41B$92.15B$43.59B
Revenue (TTM)$272M$2.16B$552M$403.43B$250.55B
Net Income (TTM)$-5M$47M$-5M$4.76B$1.56B
Gross Margin75.1%37.9%75.5%3.6%3.7%
Operating Margin11.2%2.9%-0.4%1.5%0.9%
Forward P/E82.9x15.2x370.7x19.3x17.9x
Total Debt$252M$1.39B$88M$7.39B$9.35B
Cash & Equiv.$73M$308M$167M$5.69B$3.87B

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HROW
ICUI
ATRC
MCK
CAH
StockMay 20May 26Return
Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW)100721.8+621.8%
ICU Medical, Inc. (ICUI)10061.7-38.3%
AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC)10058.1-41.9%
McKesson Corporation (MCK)100474.1+374.1%
Cardinal Health, In… (CAH)100338.7+238.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HROW and ICUI are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ICU Medical, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. CAH and MCK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HROW
Harrow Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HROW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 36.4%, EPS growth 71.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 45.4%
  • 9.1% 10Y total return vs MCK's 348.1%
  • 36.4% revenue growth vs ICUI's -6.4%
  • +58.8% vs ICUI's -8.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICUI
ICU Medical, Inc.
The Value Play

ICUI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (15.2x vs 17.9x)
  • 2.2% margin vs HROW's -1.9%
Best for: value and quality
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MCK
McKesson Corporation
The Niche Pick

MCK is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.

  • 5.7% ROA vs HROW's -1.4%, ROIC 5.4% vs 9.5%
Best for: efficiency
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
The Income Pick

CAH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 1.1%
  • Beta 0.03, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.94x
  • Beta 0.03 vs HROW's 2.13
  • 1.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHROW logoHROW36.4% revenue growth vs ICUI's -6.4%
ValueICUI logoICUILower P/E (15.2x vs 17.9x)
Quality / MarginsICUI logoICUI2.2% margin vs HROW's -1.9%
Stability / SafetyCAH logoCAHBeta 0.03 vs HROW's 2.13
DividendsCAH logoCAH1.1% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HROW logoHROW+58.8% vs ICUI's -8.5%
Efficiency (ROA)MCK logoMCK5.7% ROA vs HROW's -1.4%, ROIC 5.4% vs 9.5%

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HROWHarrow Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Sales Net
99.9%$272M
Other Revenues
0.1%$394,000
ICUIICU Medical, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment revenue
71.1%$75M
Software revenue
29.8%$31M
Other deferred revenue
1.1%$1M
Government Grant Revenue
-2.0%$-2,066,000
ATRCAtriCure, Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$2M
MCKMcKesson Corporation
FY 2025
U.S. Pharmaceutical Segment
91.3%$327.7B
International Segment
4.1%$14.7B
Medical-Surgical Solutions Segment
3.2%$11.4B
Prescription Technology Solutions
1.5%$5.2B
CAHCardinal Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Pharmaceutical Member
91.9%$204.6B
GMPD
5.7%$12.6B
Other Operating Segment
2.4%$5.4B

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHROWLAGGINGATRC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HROW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $403.4B annually — 1481.5x HROW's $272M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.2% (ICUI) to -1.9% (HROW). On growth, HROW holds the edge at +33.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$272M$2.2B$552M$403.4B$250.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$59M$218M$13M$6.8B$3.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$5M$47M-$5M$4.8B$1.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$73M$80M$54M$6.0B$4.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.1%+37.9%+75.5%+3.6%+3.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.2%+2.9%-0.4%+1.5%+0.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.9%+2.2%-0.8%+1.2%+0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.8%+3.7%+9.7%+1.5%+1.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.3%-12.3%+14.3%+6.0%+11.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.3%+2.9%+101.6%+37.0%-19.5%
HROW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ICUI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 28.7x trailing earnings, CAH trades at a 99% valuation discount to ICUI's 4186.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ICUI's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$3.1B$1.4B$92.1B$43.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$4.2B$1.3B$93.8B$49.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-278.93x4186.05x-115.83x29.25x28.72x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.82.86x15.23x370.67x19.28x17.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.80x77.75x18.74x16.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.34x1.38x2.63x0.26x0.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share27.56x1.44x2.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.50x29.15x17.63x23.56x
ICUI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-10 for HROW. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HROW's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICUI scores 6/9 vs HROW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-10.1%+2.2%-1.0%+3.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.4%+1.2%-0.7%+5.7%+2.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.5%+2.5%-0.6%+5.4%+33.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.2%+3.0%-0.6%+30.5%+19.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.84x0.66x0.18x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$179M$1.1B-$79M$1.7B$5.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$73M$308M$167M$5.7B$3.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$252M$1.4B$88M$7.4B$9.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.53x1.54x0.47x33.79x6.38x
MCK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HROW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HROW five years ago would be worth $47,797 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,579 for ATRC. Over the past 12 months, HROW leads with a +58.8% total return vs ICUI's -8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAH at 31.5% vs ATRC's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-21.8%-11.2%-29.2%-8.5%-9.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+58.8%-8.5%-8.3%+4.6%+22.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+43.0%-33.1%-41.8%+106.4%+127.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+378.0%-38.4%-64.2%+286.9%+235.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+914.3%+19.0%+95.1%+348.1%+160.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.7%-12.6%-16.5%+27.3%+31.5%
HROW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CAH is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HROW's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAH currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs ATRC's 64.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.13x1.23x1.03x0.04x0.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.85$160.29$43.18$999.00$233.60
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.12$107.00$26.62$637.00$137.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.2%+76.8%+64.4%+75.3%+79.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.641.745.016.233.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded733K257K669K757K1.7M
CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HROW as "Buy", ICUI as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", MCK as "Buy", CAH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.8% upside for HROW (target: $76) vs 32.9% for ICUI (target: $164). For income investors, CAH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.10% vs MCK's 0.36%.

MetricHROW logoHROWHarrow Health, In…ICUI logoICUIICU Medical, Inc.ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.MCK logoMCKMcKesson Corporat…CAH logoCAHCardinal Health, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.67$163.50$50.67$1006.50$249.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1011193133
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01720
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.69$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%+0.8%+3.4%+1.8%
CAH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HROW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CAH leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallHarrow Health, Inc. (HROW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HROW vs ICUI vs ATRC vs MCK vs CAH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Harrow Health, Inc.

(HROW) is the stronger pick with 36. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for ICU Medical, Inc. (ICUI). Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) offers the better valuation at 28. 7x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

On trailing P/E, Cardinal Health, Inc.

(CAH) is the cheapest at 28. 7x versus ICU Medical, Inc. at 4186. 1x. On forward P/E, ICU Medical, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

Over the past 5 years, Harrow Health, Inc.

(HROW) delivered a total return of +378. 0%, compared to -64. 2% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HROW returned +914. 3% versus ICUI's +19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cardinal Health, Inc.

(CAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Harrow Health, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning HROW is approximately 6176% more volatile than CAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 5% for Harrow Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harrow Health, Inc.

(HROW) is pulling ahead at 36. 4% versus -6. 4% for ICU Medical, Inc. (ICUI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ICU Medical, Inc. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to 14. 9% for McKesson Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HROW leads at 45. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the more profitable company, earning 0.

9% net margin versus -2. 1% for AtriCure, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HROW leads at 11. 2% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HROW leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ICU Medical, Inc.

(ICUI) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 355. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HROW: 93. 8% to $75. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH?

In this comparison, CAH (1.

1% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HROW, ICUI, ATRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HROW or ICUI or ATRC or MCK or CAH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cardinal Health, Inc.

(CAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 1. 1% yield, +160. 8% 10Y return). Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAH: +160. 8%, HROW: +914. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HROW and ICUI and ATRC and MCK and CAH?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HROW is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICUI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CAH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CAH pays a dividend while HROW, ICUI, ATRC, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HROW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICUI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAH

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HROW and ICUI and ATRC and MCK and CAH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HROW: 33.3% · ICUI: -12.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.