Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HSBC vs DB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
HSBC vs DB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $300.37B | $58.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147.86B | $60.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22.28B | $6.93B |
| Gross Margin | 54.6% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $495.79B | $254.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $286.92B | $171.62B |
HSBC vs DB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 396.5 | +296.5% |
| Deutsche Bank AG (DB) | 100 | 369.6 | +269.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSBC vs DB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.4%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth -2.4%
- 254.2% 10Y total return vs DB's 97.4%
DB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.08 vs HSBC's 0.32
- NIM 1.1% vs HSBC's 1.1%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% NII/revenue growth vs DB's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.08 vs 0.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HSBC's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs DB's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.8% vs DB's +16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs HSBC's 0.3% |
HSBC vs DB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 2.4x DB's $60.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.1% (HSBC) to 11.4% (DB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147.9B | $60.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31.9B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22.3B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9.4B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.3% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, DB trades at a 41% valuation discount to HSBC's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DB offers better value at 0.07x vs HSBC's 0.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $300.4B | $58.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $509.2B | $155.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.45x | 8.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.56x | 9.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.32x | 0.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.94x | 13.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.66x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.99x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSBC delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for DB. HSBC carries lower financial leverage with a 2.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DB's 3.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSBC scores 6/9 vs DB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.68x | 3.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $208.9B | $83.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $286.9B | $171.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $495.8B | $254.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 0.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,869 for DB. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +60.8% total return vs DB's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DB at 44.5% vs HSBC's 37.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | -22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.8% | +16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.9% | +202.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.6% | +138.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +254.2% | +97.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.1% | +44.5% |
Risk & Volatility
HSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DB's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs DB's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $94.80 | $40.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.21 | $26.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HSBC as "Hold" and DB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -40.5% upside for HSBC (target: $52) vs -51.5% for DB (target: $15). HSBC is the only dividend payer here at 4.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.00 | $14.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
HSBC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
HSBC vs DB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSBC or DB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger pick with 3.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Deutsche Bank AG (DB) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSBC or DB?
On trailing P/E, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus HSBC Holdings plc at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Deutsche Bank AG is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deutsche Bank AG wins at 0. 08x versus HSBC Holdings plc's 0. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSBC or DB?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +221.
6%, compared to +138. 7% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +254. 2% versus DB's +97. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSBC or DB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Deutsche Bank AG's 1. 48β — meaning DB is approximately 32% more volatile than HSBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Deutsche Bank AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSBC or DB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is pulling ahead at 3.
2% versus -8. 3% for Deutsche Bank AG (DB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deutsche Bank AG grew EPS 125. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSBC or DB?
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
1% net margin versus 11. 4% for Deutsche Bank AG — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSBC leads at 20. 3% versus 16. 0% for DB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSBC leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSBC or DB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 08x versus HSBC Holdings plc's 0. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deutsche Bank AG (DB) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for HSBC Holdings plc — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HSBC: -40. 5% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSBC or DB?
In this comparison, HSBC (4.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HSBC or DB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 4. 4% yield, +254. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +254. 2%, DB: +97. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSBC and DB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HSBC pays a dividend while DB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.