HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$737M
5Y Perf.+172.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HSHP vs NMM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.+196.7%
HSHP vs NMM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HSHP | NMM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $737M | $2.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132M | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $262M |
| Gross Margin | 72.0% | 56.7% |
| Operating Margin | 51.6% | 28.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.1x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $689M | $1.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $270M |
HSHP vs NMM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HSHP
NMM
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Himalaya Shipping L… (HSHP) | 100 | 272.2 | +172.2% |
| Navios Maritime Par… (NMM) | 100 | 296.7 | +196.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSHP vs NMM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NMM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Himalaya Shipping Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
The Growth Play
HSHP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth -20.8%
- Beta 0.93, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.08x
- 6.7% revenue growth vs NMM's 2.1%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Income Pick
NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 0.3%
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs HSHP's 199.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.08x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HSHP | 6.7% revenue growth vs NMM's 2.1% |
| Value | NMM | Lower P/E (4.8x vs 12.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | NMM | 19.9% margin vs HSHP's 13.4% |
| Stability / Safety | NMM | Beta 0.72 vs HSHP's 0.93, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HSHP | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NMM's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HSHP | +204.3% vs NMM's +99.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NMM | 4.4% ROA vs HSHP's 2.1%, ROIC 8.3% vs 6.3% |
HSHP vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
HSHP vs NMM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGHSHP
HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd.
1leads
NMMNavios Maritime Partn…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HSHPMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HSHP5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NMM5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NMM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSHP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 9.9x HSHP's $132M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HSHP's 13.4%. On growth, HSHP holds the edge at +42.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $132M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $262M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $52M | $30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.0% | +56.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.2% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | -40.6% |
HSHP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NMM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 86% valuation discount to HSHP's 41.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSHP's 13.9x.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $737M | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.55x | 5.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.12x | 4.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.90x | 4.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.49x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.25x | — |
NMM leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSHP delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $8 for NMM. NMM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HSHP's 4.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMM scores 7/9 vs HSHP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.26x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $657M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $270M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $689M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.34x | 2.78x |
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSHP five years ago would be worth $29,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,051 for NMM. Over the past 12 months, HSHP leads with a +204.3% total return vs NMM's +99.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NMM at 46.9% vs HSHP's 45.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +82.1% | +39.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +204.3% | +99.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +206.4% | +216.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.6% | +120.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.6% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.2% | +46.9% |
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HSHP's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSHP currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.84 | $77.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.27 | $35.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 57.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 314K | 166K |
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HSHP as "Sell" and NMM as "Hold". For income investors, HSHP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.81% vs NMM's 0.29%.
| Metric | HSHPHimalaya Shipping… | NMMNavios Maritime P… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
Evenly matched — HSHP and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HSHP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HSHP vs NMM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSHP or NMM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
(HSHP) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSHP or NMM?
On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Himalaya Shipping Ltd. at 41. 6x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSHP or NMM?
Over the past 5 years, Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
(HSHP) delivered a total return of +199. 6%, compared to +120. 5% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMM returned +267. 2% versus HSHP's +199. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSHP or NMM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Himalaya Shipping Ltd. 's 0. 93β — meaning HSHP is approximately 28% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 4% for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSHP or NMM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
(HSHP) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus 2. 1% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navios Maritime Partners L. P. grew EPS -14. 9% year-over-year, compared to -20. 8% for Himalaya Shipping Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSHP or NMM?
Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 5% net margin versus 13. 8% for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSHP leads at 53. 2% versus 33. 6% for NMM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HSHP leads at 77. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HSHP or NMM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.
P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HSHP or NMM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).
09Is HSHP or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
(HSHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 3. 8% yield, +199. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSHP: +199. 6%, NMM: +267. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HSHP and NMM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HSHP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. HSHP pays a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HSHP: 42.2% · NMM: 1.8%)Net Margin>
%
(HSHP: 13.4% · NMM: 19.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(HSHP: 41.6x · NMM: 6.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.