Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Aerospace & Defense
Specialty Business Services
Aerospace & Defense
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Specialty Business Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $95M | $19.12B | $158M | $529.86B | $3M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $71M | $2M | $72M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $998K | $-342M | $-293M | $-25.02B | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.4% | -46.5% | 40.8% | 66.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -405.7% | -183.1% | -121.4% | -24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 35.8x | — | — | 10.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $32M | $420M | $8.76B | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8K | $2.34B | $179M | $24.81B | $2M |
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Space Acqui… (HSPO) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 2065.2 | +1965.2% |
| Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 14.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- 3.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 4.3% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -1.9% vs -7.3%
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs HSPO's 20.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs HSPO's -65.3%
SPCE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.91
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 4.19x
- Beta 1.91 vs MNTS's 3.48
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, MNTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs HSPO's -65.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.91 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs SPCE's -12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -1.9% vs -7.3% |
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASTS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • HSPO leads 0 • SPCE leads 0 • MNTS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASTS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPIR and HSPO operate at a comparable scale, with $72M and $0 in trailing revenue. ASTS is the more profitable business, keeping -4.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $71M | $2M | $72M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$237M | -$287M | -$74M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $997,670 | -$342M | -$293M | -$25.0B | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$680,490 | -$1.1B | -$460M | -$16.2B | -$18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +53.4% | -46.5% | +40.8% | +66.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -4.1% | -183.1% | -121.4% | -24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.8% | -176.2% | -349.6% | -34.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -16.0% | -277.1% | -227.0% | -17.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.3% | -9.2% | -26.9% | +118.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | -55.6% | +59.0% | +59.5% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ASTS and SPCE and MNTS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 72% valuation discount to HSPO's 35.8x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $19.1B | $158M | $529.9B | $3M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $97M | $16.8B | $400M | $513.8B | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.79x | -48.76x | -0.18x | 10.01x | -0.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 45.97x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 269.64x | 22.49x | 7405.21x | 1.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.63x | 5.68x | 0.19x | 4.56x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSPO delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SPCE. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPCE's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASTS scores 5/9 vs SPCE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | -21.1% | -129.5% | -88.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -12.6% | -34.3% | -47.3% | -2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -47.1% | -42.0% | -0.1% | -7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -10.0% | -41.7% | -0.1% | -13.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.01x | 1.30x | 0.08x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$2.3B | $242M | -$16.1B | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7,815 | $2.3B | $179M | $24.8B | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $32M | $420M | $8.8B | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -21.20x | -21.56x | 9.20x | -54.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs SPCE's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs MNTS's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | -21.7% | -23.9% | +106.4% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.2% | +158.1% | -12.1% | +73.1% | +153.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.5% | +1194.0% | -96.9% | +198.1% | -98.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | +688.2% | -99.4% | -79.6% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | +568.8% | -98.8% | -78.8% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.8% | +134.8% | -68.7% | +43.9% | -74.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSPO and SPIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSPO is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.13x | 2.82x | 1.91x | 2.93x | 3.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.64 | $129.89 | $6.64 | $23.59 | $15.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.11 | $22.47 | $2.13 | $6.60 | $0.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +50.3% | +37.7% | +68.3% | +27.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 41.8 | 50.7 | 55.5 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281 | 14.9M | 6.1M | 1.6M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASTS as "Buy", SPCE as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 5.8% for SPCE (target: $3). HSPO is the only dividend payer here at 3.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.65 | $2.65 | $17.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 17 | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +53.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
ASTS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HSPO vs ASTS vs SPCE vs SPIR vs MNTS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp. Ordinary Shares at 35. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp.
Ordinary Shares (HSPO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 13β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately -2717% more volatile than HSPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 130% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp. Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -49. 3% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSPO leads at 0. 0% versus -53. 5% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS?
In this comparison, HSPO (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ASTS, SPCE, SPIR, MNTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HSPO or ASTS or SPCE or SPIR or MNTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp.
Ordinary Shares (HSPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 13), 3. 3% yield). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSPO: +20. 3%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HSPO and ASTS and SPCE and SPIR and MNTS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HSPO (Financial Services) and ASTS (Technology) and SPCE (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and MNTS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HSPO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HSPO pays a dividend while ASTS, SPCE, SPIR, MNTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.