Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Communication Equipment
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Aerospace & Defense | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $95M | $3M | $19.12B | $45.24B | $158M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1M | $71M | $680M | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $998K | $-36M | $-342M | $-183M | $-293M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.0% | 53.4% | 36.6% | -46.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -24.4% | -405.7% | -33.2% | -183.1% |
| Forward P/E | 35.8x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $6M | $32M | $254M | $420M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8K | $2M | $2.34B | $829M | $179M |
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Space Acqui… (HSPO) | 100 | 120.1 | +20.1% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 2065.2 | +1965.2% |
| Rocket Lab USA, Inc. (RKLB) | 100 | 1611.1 | +1511.1% |
| Virgin Galactic Hol… (SPCE) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HSPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 14.9% margin vs SPCE's -176.2%
- 3.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 4.3% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -1.9% vs -7.3%
Among these 5 stocks, MNTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs HSPO's -65.3%
RKLB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs ASTS's 5.7%
- +252.5% vs SPCE's -12.1%
SPCE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- beta 1.91
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 4.19x
- Beta 1.91 vs MNTS's 3.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs HSPO's -65.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs SPCE's -176.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.91 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +252.5% vs SPCE's -12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -1.9% vs -7.3% |
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RKLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
HSPO leads 1 • MNTS leads 0 • ASTS leads 0 • SPCE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKLB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKLB and HSPO operate at a comparable scale, with $680M and $0 in trailing revenue. RKLB is the more profitable business, keeping -26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPCE's -176.2%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1M | $71M | $680M | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$24M | -$237M | -$191M | -$287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $997,670 | -$36M | -$342M | -$183M | -$293M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$680,490 | -$18M | -$1.1B | -$316M | -$460M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +66.0% | +53.4% | +36.6% | -46.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -24.4% | -4.1% | -33.2% | -183.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -34.5% | -4.8% | -26.9% | -176.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -17.9% | -16.0% | -46.5% | -277.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +118.7% | +27.3% | +63.5% | -9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | -140.0% | -55.6% | +41.7% | +59.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNTS and RKLB and SPCE each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $3M | $19.1B | $45.2B | $158M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $97M | $7M | $16.8B | $44.7B | $400M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.79x | -0.11x | -48.76x | -212.38x | -0.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 45.97x | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.26x | 269.64x | 75.18x | 22.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.63x | — | 5.68x | 24.22x | 0.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HSPO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSPO delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-130 for SPCE. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPCE's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASTS scores 5/9 vs SPCE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | — | -21.1% | -12.3% | -129.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -2.8% | -12.6% | -8.2% | -34.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | -7.3% | -47.1% | -19.9% | -42.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -13.2% | -10.0% | -16.1% | -41.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | — | 0.01x | 0.15x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $4M | -$2.3B | -$575M | $242M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7,815 | $2M | $2.3B | $829M | $179M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $6M | $32M | $254M | $420M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -54.08x | -21.20x | -23.34x | -21.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RKLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, RKLB leads with a +252.5% total return vs SPCE's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKLB at 173.3% vs MNTS's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.7% | -23.2% | -21.7% | +3.4% | -23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.2% | +153.4% | +158.1% | +252.5% | -12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.5% | -98.4% | +1194.0% | +1941.0% | -96.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | -99.9% | +688.2% | +686.6% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | -99.9% | +568.8% | +706.4% | -98.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.8% | -74.9% | +134.8% | +173.3% | -68.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HSPO and RKLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSPO is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RKLB currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 3.65x | 2.82x | 3.08x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.64 | $15.98 | $129.89 | $99.58 | $6.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.11 | $0.44 | $22.47 | $20.23 | $2.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.1% | +27.6% | +50.3% | +78.9% | +37.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 48.1 | 41.8 | 57.7 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 281 | 1.8M | 14.9M | 21.9M | 6.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASTS as "Buy", RKLB as "Buy", SPCE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 5.8% for SPCE (target: $3). HSPO is the only dividend payer here at 3.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $103.65 | $92.33 | $2.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 7 | 18 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +53.1% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RKLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HSPO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HSPO vs MNTS vs ASTS vs RKLB vs SPCE: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp. Ordinary Shares (HSPO) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RKLB returned +983. 2% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp.
Ordinary Shares (HSPO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 14β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 65β — meaning MNTS is approximately -2768% more volatile than HSPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 130% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -31. 6% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Momentus Inc. grew EPS 90. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 9% for Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp. Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE?
Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp.
Ordinary Shares (HSPO) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -49. 3% for Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HSPO leads at 0. 0% versus -53. 5% for SPCE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE?
In this comparison, HSPO (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MNTS, ASTS, RKLB, SPCE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HSPO or MNTS or ASTS or RKLB or SPCE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Space Acquisition I Corp.
Ordinary Shares (HSPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 14), 3. 3% yield). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSPO: +20. 3%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HSPO and MNTS and ASTS and RKLB and SPCE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HSPO (Financial Services) and MNTS (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and RKLB (Industrials) and SPCE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HSPO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RKLB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPCE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HSPO pays a dividend while MNTS, ASTS, RKLB, SPCE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.