Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HTCR vs MGIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
HTCR vs MGIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $202K | $853M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $603M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $756K | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $113M |
HTCR vs MGIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartCore Enterpris… (HTCR) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTCR vs MGIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 100.0%
- PEG 0.00 vs MGIC's 0.63
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 15.0x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.63
MGIC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 222.0% 10Y total return vs HTCR's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 28.6%, current ratio 1.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.3% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 15.0x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MGIC's 6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.44 vs HTCR's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MGIC's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.7% vs HTCR's -97.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 46.2% ROA vs MGIC's 7.4%, ROIC -39.9% vs 16.2% |
HTCR vs MGIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTCR vs MGIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTCR and MGIC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $603M annually — 45.6x HTCR's $13M. HTCR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGIC's 6.6%. On growth, MGIC holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $603M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $87M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +28.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.6% | +17.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HTCR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, HTCR trades at a 100% valuation discount to MGIC's 23.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTCR offers better value at 0.00x vs MGIC's 0.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $202,089 | $853M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $827M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.04x | 23.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 0.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HTCR and MGIC each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR delivers a 151.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $152 in annual profit, vs $13 for MGIC. HTCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGIC's 0.29x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +151.8% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +46.2% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.9% | +16.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $756,179 | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.03x | 11.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGIC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGIC five years ago would be worth $12,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $33 for HTCR. Over the past 12 months, MGIC leads with a +23.7% total return vs HTCR's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGIC at 10.9% vs HTCR's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.5% | -33.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.6% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +36.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +23.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +222.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.5% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MGIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGIC is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HTCR's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGIC currently trades 62.1% from its 52-week high vs HTCR's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $668.00 | $28.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $14.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.8 | 30.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38K | 46K |
Analyst Outlook
HTCR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, HTCR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MGIC's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $51.92 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HTCR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MGIC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
HTCR vs MGIC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTCR or MGIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTCR or MGIC?
On trailing P/E, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. at 23. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTCR or MGIC?
Over the past 5 years, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) delivered a total return of +23. 1%, compared to -99. 7% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGIC returned +222. 0% versus HTCR's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTCR or MGIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. 's 1. 78β — meaning HTCR is approximately 23% more volatile than MGIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 29% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTCR or MGIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS 411. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGIC leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTCR or MGIC?
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the more profitable company, earning 64. 6% net margin versus 6. 7% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — meaning it keeps 64. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGIC leads at 11. 1% versus -33. 2% for HTCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTCR leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HTCR or MGIC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 2% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC).
08Is HTCR or MGIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +222. 0% 10Y return). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGIC: +222. 0%, HTCR: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HTCR and MGIC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTCR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.