Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $209K | $853M | $302M | $1.58B | $2.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $603M | $102M | $5.24B | $762M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $40M | $4M | $1.02B | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 28.0% | 70.3% | 69.3% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | 10.8% | 3.5% | 27.7% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 15.0x | 24.8x | 1.5x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $756K | $86M | $11M | $728M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $113M | $21M | $1.05B | $151M |
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HeartCore Enterpris… (HTCR) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.7% |
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Allot Ltd. (ALLT) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.3% |
| Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) | 100 | 162.9 | +62.9% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.00 vs SPSC's 0.89
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 12.7x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.89
- 43.8% margin vs ALLT's 3.6%
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KARO's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
MGIC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 222.0% 10Y total return vs SPSC's 119.8%
ALLT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +33.7% vs HTCR's -97.2%
KARO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 2.4%
SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 20.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
- 17.8% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs HTCR's -70.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 12.7x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs ALLT's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs ALLT's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KARO's 2.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.7% vs HTCR's -97.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 46.2% ROA vs ALLT's 2.1%, ROIC -39.9% vs 2.9% |
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HTCR leads in 1 of 6 categories
KARO leads 1 • ALLT leads 1 • MGIC leads 0 • SPSC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTCR and KARO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KARO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 396.1x HTCR's $13M. HTCR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALLT's 3.6%. On growth, KARO holds the edge at +17.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $603M | $102M | $5.2B | $762M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $87M | $8M | $2.2B | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $40M | $4M | $1.0B | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $64M | $16M | $0 | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +28.0% | +70.3% | +69.3% | +68.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +10.8% | +3.5% | +27.7% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +6.6% | +3.6% | +19.5% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +10.7% | +16.1% | +20.3% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.4% | +13.1% | +14.0% | +17.8% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.6% | +17.6% | — | +9.2% | -8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HTCR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.0x trailing earnings, HTCR trades at a 100% valuation discount to ALLT's 95.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTCR offers better value at 0.00x vs KARO's 1.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $209,080 | $853M | $302M | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $827M | $293M | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.04x | 23.17x | 95.39x | 28.19x | 23.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.98x | 24.83x | 1.51x | 12.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.00x | 0.98x | — | 1.77x | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.07x | 38.27x | 12.27x | 11.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 1.54x | 2.96x | 5.68x | 2.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 2.83x | 3.12x | 7.97x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.64x | 19.51x | 27.95x | 14.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KARO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTCR delivers a 151.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $152 in annual profit, vs $3 for ALLT. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGIC's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALLT scores 7/9 vs MGIC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +151.8% | +13.4% | +3.3% | +31.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +46.2% | +7.4% | +2.1% | +19.6% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.9% | +16.2% | +2.9% | +34.4% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.7% | +16.3% | +3.1% | +37.6% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.29x | 0.10x | 0.22x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$27M | -$10M | -$319M | -$141M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $113M | $21M | $1.0B | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $756,179 | $86M | $11M | $728M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -38.03x | 11.90x | — | 28.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KARO five years ago would be worth $14,105 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for HTCR. Over the past 12 months, ALLT leads with a +33.7% total return vs HTCR's -97.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALLT at 39.6% vs HTCR's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -97.4% | -33.3% | -20.8% | +14.8% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.2% | +28.3% | +33.7% | +17.9% | -59.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | +36.5% | +172.2% | +147.6% | -62.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +24.4% | -57.8% | +41.0% | -41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +222.0% | +62.8% | +62.0% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.3% | +10.9% | +39.6% | +35.3% | -28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KARO and SPSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALLT's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KARO currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs HTCR's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.46x | 2.35x | 1.12x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $668.00 | $28.00 | $11.92 | $63.36 | $153.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $13.85 | $5.67 | $41.25 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.5% | +62.1% | +64.2% | +81.0% | +37.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 16.7 | 30.7 | 59.8 | 50.3 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 34K | 410K | 59K | 605K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HTCR and KARO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MGIC as "Buy", ALLT as "Buy", KARO as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 91.8% upside for ALLT (target: $15) vs 6.4% for MGIC (target: $19). For income investors, HTCR offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MGIC's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.50 | $14.67 | $62.00 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 14 | 4 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.2% | — | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $51.92 | $0.20 | — | $20.21 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +5.3% |
HTCR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KARO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HTCR vs MGIC vs ALLT vs KARO vs SPSC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the stronger pick with 17. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR) offers the better valuation at 0. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
On trailing P/E, HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the cheapest at 0. 0x versus Allot Ltd. at 95. 4x. On forward P/E, Karooooo Ltd. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Karooooo Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
Over the past 5 years, Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) delivered a total return of +41. 0%, compared to -99. 7% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGIC returned +222. 0% versus HTCR's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Allot Ltd. 's 2. 35β — meaning ALLT is approximately 128% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 29% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is pulling ahead at 17. 8% versus -70. 5% for HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. (HTCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HeartCore Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS 411. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPSC leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
HeartCore Enterprises, Inc.
(HTCR) is the more profitable company, earning 64. 6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Allot Ltd. — meaning it keeps 64. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KARO leads at 28. 7% versus -33. 2% for HTCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLT leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus SPS Commerce, Inc. 's 0. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Karooooo Ltd. (KARO) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Allot Ltd. — 23. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALLT: 91. 8% to $14. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC?
In this comparison, HTCR (100.
0% yield), KARO (2. 4% yield), MGIC (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ALLT, SPSC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HTCR or MGIC or ALLT or KARO or SPSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Karooooo Ltd.
(KARO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 2. 4% yield). Allot Ltd. (ALLT) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KARO: +62. 0%, ALLT: +62. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTCR and MGIC and ALLT and KARO and SPSC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTCR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KARO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. HTCR, MGIC, KARO pay a dividend while ALLT, SPSC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.