Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.-67.1%
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.44B
5Y Perf.+86.1%
RCMT
RCM Technologies, Inc.

Conglomerates

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$203M
5Y Perf.+580.7%
UHAL
U-Haul Holding Company

Rental & Leasing Services

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.20B
5Y Perf.-11.4%
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.51B
5Y Perf.-74.4%

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HTZ logoHTZ
CAR logoCAR
RCMT logoRCMT
UHAL logoUHAL
LYFT logoLYFT
IndustryRental & Leasing ServicesRental & Leasing ServicesConglomeratesRental & Leasing ServicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$1.93B$5.44B$203M$9.20B$5.51B
Revenue (TTM)$8.70B$11.75B$319M$6.00B$6.52B
Net Income (TTM)$-637M$-667M$16M$139M$2.86B
Gross Margin13.6%25.6%27.2%49.5%43.2%
Operating Margin2.6%11.2%7.9%8.8%-2.5%
Forward P/E33.0x12.3x136.8x23.8x
Total Debt$19.20B$31.17B$26M$7.24B$1.28B
Cash & Equiv.$1.17B$519M$3M$989M$1.13B

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HTZ
CAR
RCMT
UHAL
LYFT
StockJul 21May 26Return
Hertz Global Holdin… (HTZ)10032.9-67.1%
Avis Budget Group, … (CAR)100186.1+86.1%
RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT)100680.7+580.7%
U-Haul Holding Comp… (UHAL)10088.6-11.4%
Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)10025.6-74.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: RCMT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. U-Haul Holding Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LYFT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HTZ
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

HTZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
CAR
Avis Budget Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

CAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
  • 5.4% 10Y total return vs RCMT's 466.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
RCMT
RCM Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Leader

RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.

  • 14.7% revenue growth vs HTZ's -6.0%
  • Lower P/E (12.3x vs 136.8x)
  • +59.5% vs UHAL's -16.8%
Best for: growth and value
UHAL
U-Haul Holding Company
The Defensive Pick

UHAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 96.6%, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.04, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.04 vs RCMT's 1.30
  • 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
The Growth Play

LYFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 122.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.5%
  • 43.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
  • 39.1% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%, ROIC -6.1% vs 0.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRCMT logoRCMT14.7% revenue growth vs HTZ's -6.0%
ValueRCMT logoRCMTLower P/E (12.3x vs 136.8x)
Quality / MarginsLYFT logoLYFT43.8% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
Stability / SafetyUHAL logoUHALBeta 1.04 vs RCMT's 1.30
DividendsUHAL logoUHAL0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCMT logoRCMT+59.5% vs UHAL's -16.8%
Efficiency (ROA)LYFT logoLYFT39.1% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%, ROIC -6.1% vs 0.4%

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HTZHertz Global Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
U.S. Car Rental
83.1%$8.6B
International Car Rental
16.9%$1.7B
CARAvis Budget Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
100.0%$202M
RCMTRCM Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Health Care
51.4%$164M
Engineering Services
37.7%$120M
Technology Service
10.9%$35M
UHALU-Haul Holding Company
FY 2025
Moving and Storage Consolidations
94.1%$5.5B
Life Insurance
3.8%$222M
Property and Casualty Insurance
2.1%$125M
LYFTLyft, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRCMTLAGGINGUHAL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LYFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 36.8x RCMT's $319M. LYFT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTZ's -7.3%. On growth, LYFT holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8.7B$11.8B$319M$6.0B$6.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.9B$5.3B$27M$1.4B-$63M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$637M-$667M$16M$139M$2.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1.2B$1.9B$17M$1.0B$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.6%+25.6%+27.2%+49.5%+43.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.6%+11.2%+7.9%+8.8%-2.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.3%-5.7%+5.1%+2.3%+43.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.1%+16.6%+5.4%+16.7%+17.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.5%+4.1%+12.4%+1.9%+13.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.4%+44.1%+116.2%-160.5%
LYFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CAR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.1x trailing earnings, LYFT trades at a 93% valuation discount to UHAL's 30.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAR's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UHAL's 9.1x.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.9B$5.4B$203M$9.2B$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20.0B$36.1B$226M$15.4B$5.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.56x-6.10x13.30x30.84x2.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.98x12.35x136.83x23.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.47x6.87x8.01x9.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.23x0.47x0.63x1.58x0.87x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.74x1.36x1.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.67x4.94x
CAR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

LYFT delivers a 150.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $150 in annual profit, vs $2 for UHAL. LYFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UHAL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs LYFT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+40.9%+1.8%+150.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.8%-2.1%+12.5%+0.6%+39.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.4%+3.8%+26.9%+4.2%-6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.5%+4.5%+31.6%+4.0%-6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944844
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.56x0.97x0.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$18.0B$30.6B$23M$6.3B$145M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.2B$519M$3M$989M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19.2B$31.2B$26M$7.2B$1.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.37x0.92x9.05x2.91x-4.75x
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RCMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,286 for HTZ. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs UHAL's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 32.8% vs HTZ's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.2%+20.2%+44.0%+3.1%-28.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-0.6%+53.3%+59.5%-16.8%+12.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-62.2%+1.0%+134.2%-16.2%+65.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.1%+99.5%+712.2%-15.6%-71.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.1%+536.1%+466.9%+47.4%-81.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-27.7%+0.3%+32.8%-5.7%+18.4%
RCMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RCMT and UHAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UHAL is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs CAR's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.23x1.07x1.30x1.04x1.29x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.44$847.70$32.50$67.64$25.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.77$85.96$17.05$41.95$12.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.1%+18.2%+88.0%+77.1%+55.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.241.459.856.252.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11.1M3.1M67K224K15.2M
Evenly matched — RCMT and UHAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CAR and RCMT and UHAL each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HTZ as "Hold", CAR as "Hold", RCMT as "Buy", UHAL as "Buy", LYFT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.5% upside for UHAL (target: $80) vs -18.0% for CAR (target: $126). UHAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHTZ logoHTZHertz Global Hold…CAR logoCARAvis Budget Group…RCMT logoRCMTRCM Technologies,…UHAL logoUHALU-Haul Holding Co…LYFT logoLYFTLyft, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.83$126.40$80.00$19.21
# AnalystsCovering analysts21133259
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.18
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+3.6%0.0%+9.1%
Evenly matched — CAR and RCMT and UHAL each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

RCMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LYFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallRCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HTZ vs CAR vs RCMT vs UHAL vs LYFT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.

(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (23. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

On trailing P/E, Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus U-Haul Holding Company at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.

(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to -77. 1% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAR returned +536. 1% versus LYFT's -81. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

04β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 25% more volatile than UHAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 97% for U-Haul Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.

(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -6. 0% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lyft, Inc. grew EPS 122. 6% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYFT leads at 15. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

Lyft, Inc.

(LYFT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -8. 8% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UHAL leads at 12. 3% versus -3. 0% for LYFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHAL leads at 85. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.

(RCMT) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 136. 8x for U-Haul Holding Company — 124. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UHAL: 53. 5% to $80. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT?

In this comparison, UHAL (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. HTZ, CAR, RCMT, LYFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HTZ or CAR or RCMT or UHAL or LYFT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Avis Budget Group, Inc.

(CAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +536. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAR: +536. 1%, LYFT: -81. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HTZ and CAR and RCMT and UHAL and LYFT?

These companies operate in different sectors (HTZ (Industrials) and CAR (Industrials) and RCMT (Industrials) and UHAL (Industrials) and LYFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HTZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UHAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYFT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HTZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCMT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UHAL

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LYFT

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HTZ and CAR and RCMT and UHAL and LYFT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HTZ: 10.5% · CAR: 4.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.