Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Rental & Leasing Services
Consulting Services
Consulting Services
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Conglomerates | Rental & Leasing Services | Consulting Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $1.93B | $203M | $5.44B | $2.02B | $1.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.70B | $319M | $11.75B | $1.74B | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-637M | $16M | $-667M | $104M | $85M |
| Gross Margin | 13.6% | 27.2% | 25.6% | 23.3% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 7.9% | 11.2% | 11.3% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.3x | 33.0x | 14.2x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $19.20B | $26M | $31.17B | $548M | $571M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.17B | $3M | $519M | $25M | $5M |
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hertz Global Holdin… (HTZ) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 680.7 | +580.7% |
| Avis Budget Group, … (CAR) | 100 | 186.1 | +86.1% |
| Huron Consulting Gr… (HURN) | 100 | 254.0 | +154.0% |
| ICF International, … (ICFI) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 466.9% 10Y total return vs CAR's 5.4%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3%
- +59.5% vs HURN's -17.2%
Among these 5 stocks, CAR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HURN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 6.0% margin vs HTZ's -7.3%
ICFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 55.6%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.52, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 33.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs ICFI's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.0% margin vs HTZ's -7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RCMT's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.5% vs HURN's -17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs HTZ's -2.8%, ROIC 26.9% vs 0.4% |
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
HURN leads 1 • ICFI leads 1 • HTZ leads 0 • CAR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HURN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 36.8x RCMT's $319M. HURN is the more profitable business, keeping 6.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HTZ's -7.3%. On growth, HURN holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.7B | $319M | $11.8B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $27M | $5.3B | $231M | $201M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$637M | $16M | -$667M | $104M | $85M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.2B | $17M | $1.9B | $124M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +27.2% | +25.6% | +23.3% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +7.9% | +11.2% | +11.3% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | +5.1% | -5.7% | +6.0% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.1% | +5.4% | +16.6% | +7.1% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +12.4% | +4.1% | +14.2% | -10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.4% | +116.2% | +44.1% | +0.8% | -22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CAR and ICFI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 38% valuation discount to HURN's 21.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAR's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HURN's 11.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $203M | $5.4B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.0B | $226M | $36.1B | $2.5B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.56x | 13.30x | -6.10x | 21.37x | 15.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.35x | 32.98x | 14.18x | 10.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.47x | 8.01x | 6.87x | 10.99x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 0.63x | 0.47x | 1.19x | 0.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.74x | — | 4.25x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.67x | — | 11.06x | 11.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for ICFI. ICFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HURN's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs CAR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +40.9% | — | +21.8% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | +12.5% | -2.1% | +6.8% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +26.9% | +3.8% | +15.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +31.6% | +4.5% | +18.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.56x | — | 1.04x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.0B | $23M | $30.6B | $524M | $566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $3M | $519M | $25M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.2B | $26M | $31.2B | $548M | $571M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.37x | 9.05x | 0.92x | 7.70x | 6.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $81,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,286 for HTZ. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +59.5% total return vs HURN's -17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 32.8% vs HTZ's -27.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +44.0% | +20.2% | -27.1% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.6% | +59.5% | +53.3% | -17.2% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.2% | +134.2% | +1.0% | +62.5% | -32.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.1% | +712.2% | +99.5% | +120.2% | -16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.1% | +466.9% | +536.1% | +116.8% | +100.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | +32.8% | +0.3% | +17.6% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCMT and ICFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs CAR's 18.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.07x | 0.82x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.44 | $32.50 | $847.70 | $186.78 | $101.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.77 | $17.05 | $85.96 | $112.45 | $64.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.1% | +88.0% | +18.2% | +66.8% | +73.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 59.8 | 41.4 | 37.4 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.1M | 67K | 3.1M | 243K | 349K |
Analyst Outlook
ICFI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HTZ as "Hold", RCMT as "Buy", CAR as "Hold", HURN as "Buy", ICFI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.3% upside for HURN (target: $200) vs -18.0% for CAR (target: $126). ICFI is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.83 | — | $126.40 | $200.00 | $102.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.6% | +0.1% | +8.2% | +4.1% |
RCMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). HURN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HTZ vs RCMT vs CAR vs HURN vs ICFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, ICF International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +712. 2%, compared to -77. 1% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. (HTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAR returned +536. 1% versus HTZ's -77. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 151% more volatile than ICFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 74. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for ICF International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
(HURN) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -8. 8% for Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 1. 1% for HTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICFI leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Avis Budget Group, Inc. — 22. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 60. 3% to $200. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI?
In this comparison, ICFI (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. HTZ, RCMT, CAR, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HTZ or RCMT or CAR or HURN or ICFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ICF International, Inc.
(ICFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 0. 8% yield, +100. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICFI: +100. 5%, HTZ: -77. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTZ and RCMT and CAR and HURN and ICFI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. ICFI pays a dividend while HTZ, RCMT, CAR, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.