Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HURA logo
HURA
IMVT logo
IMVT
KYMR logo
KYMR
RCUS logo
RCUS
TGTX logo
TGTX
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HURA
TuHURA Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$164M
5Y Perf.-95.7%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.26B
5Y Perf.+4.1%
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.38B
5Y Perf.+183.5%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.45B
5Y Perf.+2.1%
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.15B
5Y Perf.+114.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+224.6%

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HURA logoHURA
IMVT logoIMVT
KYMR logoKYMR
RCUS logoRCUS
TGTX logoTGTX
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$164M$7.26B$7.38B$2.45B$8.15B$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$51M$236M$700M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-31M$-506M$-315M$-369M$462M$57.05B
Gross Margin33.2%90.7%83.0%60.0%
Operating Margin-7.0%-168.6%21.3%25.9%
Forward P/E38.6x14.6x
Total Debt$503K$72K$82M$99M$261M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$902M$357M$222M$79M$343.34B

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HURA
IMVT
KYMR
RCUS
TGTX
JPM
StockAug 20Jun 26Return
TuHURA Biosciences,… (HURA)1004.3-95.7%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100104.1+4.1%
Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR)100283.5+183.5%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)100102.1+2.1%
TG Therapeutics, In… (TGTX)100214.5+114.5%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100324.6+224.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TGTX leads in 4 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. RCUS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇TGTX emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HURA
TuHURA Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

HURA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
KYMR
Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
  • Beta 0.85, current ratio 10.47x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +185.7% vs HURA's -4.8%
Best for: momentum
TGTX
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

TGTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 87.3%, EPS growth 17.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
  • 87.3% revenue growth vs HURA's -34.2%
  • 66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
  • Beta 0.62 vs HURA's 3.31
Best for: growth exposure
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 1.8%
  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 255.2%
  • Lower P/E (14.6x vs 38.6x)
  • 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTGTX logoTGTX87.3% revenue growth vs HURA's -34.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 38.6x)
Quality / MarginsTGTX logoTGTX66.0% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyTGTX logoTGTXBeta 0.62 vs HURA's 3.31
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+185.7% vs HURA's -4.8%
Efficiency (ROA)TGTX logoTGTX42.8% ROA vs HURA's -105.4%, ROIC 16.4% vs -239.0%

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HURATuHURA Biosciences, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KYMRKymera Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
TGTXTG Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
98.5%$607M
Royalty
0.9%$6M
Other Revenue
0.6%$4M
License Revenue
0.0%$152,000
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTGTXLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. TGTX is the more profitable business, keeping 66.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, TGTX holds the edge at +69.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$51M$236M$700M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$32M-$532M-$352M-$391M$150M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$31M-$506M-$315M-$369M$462M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$27M-$407M-$244M-$489M-$14M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.2%+90.7%+83.0%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-7.0%-168.6%+21.3%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.1%-156.4%+66.0%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%-2.1%-2.0%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.5%-39.3%+69.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.3%-14.1%+13.4%+10.5%+2.9%+16.0%
TGTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 16% valuation discount to TGTX's 19.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TGTX's 67.4x.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$164M$7.3B$7.4B$2.4B$8.1B$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$161M$6.4B$7.1B$2.3B$8.3B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-4.08x-12.76x-24.51x-7.39x19.21x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.38.57x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple67.40x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue188.34x9.91x13.22x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.88x7.56x4.83x4.14x13.26x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.01x
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

TGTX delivers a 87.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $87 in annual profit, vs $-154 for HURA. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-154.0%-68.2%-25.0%-69.0%+87.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-105.4%-62.2%-22.3%-35.3%+42.8%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.4%-24.9%-64.1%+16.4%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-176.3%-68.3%-27.2%-42.1%+17.7%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9224045
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.00x0.05x0.16x0.40x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M-$902M-$275M-$123M$182M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$902M$357M$222M$79M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$502,668$72,000$82M$99M$261M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-46.37x-2119.53x-13.38x5.67x0.74x
TGTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KYMR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,469 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $264 for HURA. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +185.7% total return vs HURA's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 53.1% vs HURA's -9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+242.7%+36.4%+24.3%+4.4%+81.8%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-4.8%+122.8%+94.7%+185.7%+51.3%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-25.3%+77.8%+259.0%+28.3%+119.7%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.4%+214.7%+91.0%+5.4%+41.7%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+255.2%+171.9%+43.0%+658.1%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-9.3%+21.1%+53.1%+8.7%+30.0%+33.7%
KYMR leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TGTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HURA's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TGTX currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HURA's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.31x1.59x0.85x1.95x0.62x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.90$36.27$103.00$28.72$54.07$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.41$14.32$36.65$7.91$25.28$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.9%+97.4%+87.8%+84.6%+98.4%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.963.666.351.080.972.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded828K1.9M515K1.1M2.1M7.4M
TGTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HURA as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", TGTX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for RCUS (target: $31) vs 2.4% for TGTX (target: $55). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHURA logoHURATuHURA Bioscience…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.KYMR logoKYMRKymera Therapeuti…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…TGTX logoTGTXTG Therapeutics, …JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$45.00$112.60$31.00$54.50$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts22326181361
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.1%+3.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TGTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallTG Therapeutics, Inc. (TGTX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HURA vs IMVT vs KYMR vs RCUS vs TGTX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the stronger pick with 87. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus TG Therapeutics, Inc. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +214. 7%, compared to -97. 4% for TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TGTX returned +658. 1% versus HURA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning HURA is approximately 436% more volatile than TGTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is pulling ahead at 87. 3% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TG Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 1747% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TGTX leads at 504. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

TG Therapeutics, Inc.

(TGTX) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 72. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 38. 6x for TG Therapeutics, Inc. — 24. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCUS: 27. 5% to $31. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. HURA, IMVT, KYMR, RCUS, TGTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HURA or IMVT or KYMR or RCUS or TGTX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). TuHURA Biosciences, Inc. (HURA) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, HURA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HURA and IMVT and KYMR and RCUS and TGTX and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (HURA (Healthcare) and IMVT (Healthcare) and KYMR (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and TGTX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HURA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TGTX is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while HURA, IMVT, KYMR, RCUS, TGTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.