Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
HWBK vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $260M | $20.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $11.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 6.2x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $599M |
HWBK vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs FIS's -25.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 89.2%, current ratio 0.11x
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs HWBK's 0.93
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs HWBK's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.0x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.93 | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.9% margin vs HWBK's 21.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs FIS's 0.61 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.8% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs HWBK's 1.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.1% |
HWBK vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HWBK vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 104.0x HWBK's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.9% (FIS) to 21.2% (HWBK).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $4.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +37.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +22.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +30.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $20.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $23.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | 52.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | 6.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 1.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 7.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $15 for HWBK. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 21.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, HWBK leads with a +35.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWBK at 30.7% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | -38.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | -18.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | -25.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | -6.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIS's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWBK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $37.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +47.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs HWBK's 2.06%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $62.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +7.0% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HWBK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
HWBK vs FIS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWBK or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWBK or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning FIS is approximately 74% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWBK or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 2. 2% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWBK or FIS?
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 1% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK).
08Is HWBK or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HWBK and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.