Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
HWBK logo
HWBK
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HWBK vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$260M
5Y Perf.+115.4%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

HWBK vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HWBK logoHWBK
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$260M$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$112M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$2.67B
Gross Margin71.3%37.6%
Operating Margin26.0%17.9%
Forward P/E11.0x6.2x
Total Debt$155M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$105M$599M

HWBK vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HWBK
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK)100215.4+115.4%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HWBK vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
HWBK
Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HWBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
  • 301.1% 10Y total return vs FIS's -25.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 89.2%, current ratio 0.11x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Growth Play

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs HWBK's 0.93
  • Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFIS logoFIS5.4% revenue growth vs HWBK's 2.2%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.0x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.93
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs HWBK's 21.2%
Stability / SafetyHWBK logoHWBKBeta 0.35 vs FIS's 0.61
DividendsHWBK logoHWBK2.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%
Momentum (1Y)HWBK logoHWBK+35.8% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs HWBK's 1.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.1%

HWBK vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
HWBKHawthorn Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking
39.9%$4M
Service
37.5%$4M
Fiduciary and Trust
22.5%$2M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

HWBK vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHWBKLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 104.0x HWBK's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.9% (FIS) to 21.2% (HWBK).

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$23M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.3%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.0%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.2%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.4%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.4%+30.6%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.0x trailing earnings, HWBK trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWBK offers better value at 0.93x vs FIS's 2.14x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$260M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$310M$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.99x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.89x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.32x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.51x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.37x7.21x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $15 for HWBK. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWBK's 0.89x.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.3%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.2%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.89x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$50M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$105M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$155M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.92x21.16x
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWBK five years ago would be worth $19,534 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, HWBK leads with a +35.8% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWBK at 30.7% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+12.0%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.8%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.4%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.3%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%-6.8%
HWBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

HWBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIS's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HWBK currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.35x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.98$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$27.07$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.3%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.430.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K5.6M
HWBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs HWBK's 2.06%.

MetricHWBK logoHWBKHawthorn Bancshar…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts37
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises141
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.78$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%+7.0%
Evenly matched — HWBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HWBK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallHawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HWBK vs FIS: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HWBK or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK). Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HWBK or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) delivered a total return of +95. 3%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HWBK or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning FIS is approximately 74% more volatile than HWBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 89% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HWBK or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus 2. 2% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HWBK or FIS?

Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWBK leads at 26. 0% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 2. 1% for Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (HWBK).

08

Is HWBK or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc.

(HWBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 2. 1% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HWBK: +301. 1%, FIS: -25. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between HWBK and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.