Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $260M | $1.61B | $355.61B | $506M | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $597M | $49.28B | $274M | $487M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $24M | $127M | $13.70B | $51M | $113M |
| Gross Margin | 71.3% | 57.7% | 61.7% | 44.4% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | 22.8% | 29.3% | 17.1% | 28.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.8x | 25.3x | 9.7x | 12.2x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $618M | $45.49B | $259M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $76M | $10.27B | $31M | $72M |
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorn Bancshares… (HWBK) | 100 | 215.4 | +115.4% |
| QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) | 100 | 308.9 | +208.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 368.5 | +268.5% |
| German American Ban… (GABC) | 100 | 147.6 | +47.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 31.4%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs QCRH's 254.2%
- Beta 0.35 vs QCRH's 0.83
QCRH is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +45.1% vs KO's +17.2%
KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs FBIZ's 18.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs FBIZ's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0%
FBIZ is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.39 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.2x), PEG 0.39 vs 2.22
GABC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 15.7%, current ratio 0.18x
- Beta 0.59, yield 2.6%, current ratio 0.18x
- NIM 3.5% vs QCRH's 2.7%
- 54.5% NII/revenue growth vs QCRH's 1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.5% NII/revenue growth vs QCRH's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.2x), PEG 0.39 vs 2.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs FBIZ's 18.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs QCRH's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs FBIZ's 1.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs 7.0% |
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBIZ leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • HWBK leads 1 • QCRH leads 0 • GABC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HWBK and KO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 439.7x HWBK's $112M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIZ's 18.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $597M | $49.3B | $274M | $487M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | $145M | $15.5B | $49M | $167M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $24M | $127M | $13.7B | $51M | $113M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $354M | $12.6B | $53M | $154M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.3% | +57.7% | +61.7% | +44.4% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +22.8% | +29.3% | +17.1% | +28.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +21.3% | +27.8% | +18.7% | +23.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +59.3% | +25.5% | +19.3% | +31.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +20.3% | +18.2% | +12.9% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 63% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.40x vs GABC's 2.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $260M | $1.6B | $355.6B | $506M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $310M | $2.2B | $390.8B | $734M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.99x | 12.81x | 27.18x | 10.00x | 15.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.80x | 25.27x | 9.75x | 12.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | 0.88x | 2.43x | 0.40x | 2.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.89x | 15.85x | 26.39x | 12.15x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.32x | 2.70x | 7.42x | 1.81x | 3.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.45x | 10.40x | 1.33x | 1.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.37x | 4.55x | 67.15x | 8.28x | 11.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for GABC. GABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs HWBK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +11.9% | +41.1% | +14.1% | +10.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.4% | +13.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +6.2% | +15.8% | +7.0% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +2.4% | +17.3% | +2.6% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.89x | 0.56x | 1.33x | 0.70x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $541M | $35.2B | $229M | $111M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $76M | $10.3B | $31M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $618M | $45.5B | $259M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.92x | 0.58x | 10.70x | 0.42x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $24,159 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,035 for GABC. Over the past 12 months, QCRH leads with a +45.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWBK at 30.7% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +17.4% | +20.3% | +14.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.8% | +45.1% | +17.2% | +26.5% | +22.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.4% | +122.1% | +47.0% | +108.8% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +107.4% | +65.6% | +141.6% | +30.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +254.2% | +121.1% | +186.7% | +150.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.7% | +30.5% | +13.7% | +27.8% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KO and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QCRH's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.83x | -0.20x | 0.70x | 0.59x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.98 | $97.25 | $84.04 | $61.00 | $46.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.07 | $63.68 | $65.35 | $45.90 | $36.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +99.1% | +98.3% | +99.4% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 65.7 | 60.6 | 62.9 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 95K | 12.7M | 39K | 113K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and GABC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QCRH as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy", GABC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, GABC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs QCRH's 0.25%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $103.00 | $86.13 | $67.00 | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 48 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +0.3% | +2.5% | +2.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 | 56 | 13 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.78 | $0.24 | $2.04 | $1.19 | $1.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.3% | +0.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
FBIZ leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HWBK vs QCRH vs KO vs FBIZ vs GABC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, German American Bancorp, Inc.
(GABC) is the stronger pick with 54. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +141. 6%, compared to +30. 3% for German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWBK returned +301. 1% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus QCR Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning QCRH is approximately -517% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), German American Bancorp, Inc.
(GABC) is pulling ahead at 54. 5% versus 1. 5% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 31. 4% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for German American Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 18. 0% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GABC leads at 28. 7% versus 21. 6% for FBIZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWBK leads at 71. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 10. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
German American Bancorp, Inc. (GABC) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 3% for QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH).
09Is HWBK or QCRH or KO or FBIZ or GABC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, QCRH: +254. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWBK and QCRH and KO and FBIZ and GABC?
These companies operate in different sectors (HWBK (Financial Services) and QCRH (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FBIZ (Financial Services) and GABC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HWBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; QCRH is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; GABC is a small-cap high-growth stock. HWBK, KO, FBIZ, GABC pay a dividend while QCRH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.