HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$652M
5Y Perf.+0.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
HY vs AGCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$8.53B
5Y Perf.+113.2%
HY vs AGCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | HY | AGCO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $652M | $8.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.65B | $10.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-99M | $771M |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $385M | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $862M |
HY vs AGCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
HY
AGCO
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyster-Yale Materia… (HY) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 213.2 | +113.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HY vs AGCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AGCO leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HY
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
The Income Pick
HY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.65, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth -12.5%, EPS growth -142.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.0%
- -12.5% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
AGCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 178.0% 10Y total return vs HY's -16.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 58.7%, current ratio 1.39x
- Beta 1.10, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.39x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HY | -12.5% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% |
| Value | AGCO | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | AGCO | 7.4% margin vs HY's -2.7% |
| Stability / Safety | AGCO | Beta 1.10 vs HY's 1.65, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HY | 3.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AGCO's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AGCO | +25.9% vs HY's -1.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AGCO | 6.3% ROA vs HY's -4.9%, ROIC 8.3% vs 1.6% |
HY vs AGCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
HY vs AGCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAGCOLAGGINGHY
HYHyster-Yale Materials…
2leads
AGCOAGCO Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs HYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AGCO6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
HY3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AGCO7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AGCO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HY2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.4B annually — 2.8x HY's $3.7B. AGCO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HY's -2.7%. On growth, AGCO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $963M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$99M | $771M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $546M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.7% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | +4.4% |
AGCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
HY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AGCO's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HY's 14.4x.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $652M | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $913M | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.84x | 12.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.43x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.62x | 11.52x |
HY leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCO delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-19 for HY. AGCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HY's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs HY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.2% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $262M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $862M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $385M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.40x | 10.36x |
AGCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGCO five years ago would be worth $9,036 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,608 for HY. Over the past 12 months, AGCO leads with a +25.9% total return vs HY's -1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGCO at 0.5% vs HY's -7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.4% | +11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.3% | +25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.4% | +1.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.7% | +178.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.7% | +0.5% |
AGCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HY and AGCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGCO is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HY's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.55 | $143.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.41 | $93.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.5% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 696K |
Evenly matched — HY and AGCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HY as "Buy" and AGCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.8% upside for HY (target: $40) vs 8.1% for AGCO (target: $127). For income investors, HY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs AGCO's 0.99%.
| Metric | HYHyster-Yale Mater… | AGCOAGCO Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $127.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.43 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.9% |
HY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AGCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HY leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallAGCO Corporation (AGCO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
HY vs AGCO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HY or AGCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
(HY) is the stronger pick with -12. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HY or AGCO?
Over the past 5 years, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) delivered a total return of -9.
6%, compared to -43. 9% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCO returned +178. 0% versus HY's -16. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HY or AGCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning HY is approximately 50% more volatile than AGCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 78% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HY or AGCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.
(HY) is pulling ahead at -12. 5% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -142. 2% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HY leads at 2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HY or AGCO?
AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
2% net margin versus -1. 6% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGCO leads at 6. 9% versus 0. 5% for HY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGCO leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HY or AGCO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HY: 8.
8% to $40. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — HY or AGCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).
08Is HY or AGCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 1. 0% yield, +178. 0% 10Y return). Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGCO: +178. 0%, HY: -16. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HY and AGCO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(HY: -12.7% · AGCO: 14.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.