HY vs TEX

For growth investors, Terex Corporation (TEX) is the stronger pick with 5.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 5% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). Terex Corporation (TEX) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Terex Corporation (TEX) delivered a total return of +20.

5%, compared to -43. 9% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEX returned +188. 3% versus HY's -16. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

(HY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 65β versus Terex Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning TEX is approximately 29% more volatile than HY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 134% for Terex Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Terex Corporation (TEX) is pulling ahead at 5.

7% versus -12. 5% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Terex Corporation grew EPS -32. 9% year-over-year, compared to -142. 2% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TEX leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Terex Corporation (TEX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

1% net margin versus -1. 6% for Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TEX leads at 8. 8% versus 0. 5% for HY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TEX leads at 19. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TEX: 27.

7% to $80. 25.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (HY) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 1% for Terex Corporation (TEX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc.

(HY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 9% yield). Terex Corporation (TEX) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HY: -16. 7%, TEX: +188. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.