Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $464M | $646M | $4.36B | $62.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $170M | $710M | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-57M | $-183M | $-1.63B | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | -15.9% | 99.8% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -18.9% | -67.6% | 38.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 123.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $144M | $997M | $2.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $295M | $1M | $2.45B |
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyliion Holdings Co… (HYLN) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| FuelCell Energy, In… (FCEL) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 3220.9 | +3120.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HYLN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 130.3%, EPS growth -10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.39, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 10.00x
- 130.3% revenue growth vs PLUG's 12.9%
- Beta 2.39 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
FCEL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.91, yield 1.0%
- Beta 2.91, yield 1.0%, current ratio 6.63x
- 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs PLUG's 62.2%
- 0.2% margin vs HYLN's -16.5%
- +14.6% vs HYLN's +52.5%
- 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.3% revenue growth vs PLUG's 12.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs HYLN's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.39 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs HYLN's +52.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 4.1% vs 10.9% |
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCEL leads 2 • HYLN leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 704.8x HYLN's $3M. BE is the more profitable business, keeping 0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYLN's -16.5%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $170M | $710M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$60M | -$84M | -$1.5B | $240M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$57M | -$183M | -$1.6B | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | -$126M | -$2M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -15.9% | +99.8% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -67.6% | +38.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | -108.0% | -2.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | -74.2% | -0.3% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.8% | +60.7% | +17.6% | +130.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +65.5% | +95.9% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $464M | $646M | $4.4B | $62.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $445M | $495M | $5.4B | $62.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.48x | -1.66x | — | -699.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 123.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 508.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 133.54x | 4.08x | 6.14x | 30.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.26x | 0.43x | — | 78.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 1087.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PLUG and BE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BE delivers a 0.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. HYLN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCEL scores 5/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.8% | -26.8% | -124.4% | +0.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.1% | -20.1% | -64.3% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.7% | -14.0% | +10.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.6% | -13.8% | +18.6% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.20x | 19.75x | 3.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$151M | $996M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $295M | $1M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $144M | $997M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -30.14x | -36.18x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $500 for FCEL. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs HYLN's +52.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs FCEL's -44.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.7% | +50.3% | +40.4% | +162.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.5% | +219.0% | +303.6% | +1464.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.3% | -82.9% | -66.3% | +1425.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | -95.0% | -86.4% | +1013.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -99.4% | +62.2% | +934.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | -44.5% | -30.4% | +148.0% |
Risk & Volatility
HYLN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HYLN is the less volatile stock with a 2.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYLN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs PLUG's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.39x | 2.91x | 2.57x | 3.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.56 | $14.30 | $4.58 | $302.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.11 | $3.66 | $0.69 | $16.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +85.9% | +68.3% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.4 | 64.9 | 63.3 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 949K | 3.8M | 76.5M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
FCEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HYLN as "Hold", FCEL as "Hold", PLUG as "Buy", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for HYLN (target: $3) vs -28.9% for FCEL (target: $9). FCEL is the only dividend payer here at 1.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.13 | $8.73 | $3.91 | $187.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 19 | 38 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FCEL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HYLN vs FCEL vs PLUG vs BE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is the stronger pick with 130. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 9% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Analysts rate Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -95.
0% for FuelCell Energy, Inc. (FCEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +934. 6% versus FCEL's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 39β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 51% more volatile than HYLN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is pulling ahead at 130. 3% versus 12. 9% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1414. 3% for FuelCell Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE?
Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
4% net margin versus -1645. 7% for Hyliion Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps -4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus -1886. 4% for HYLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HYLN: 26.
7% to $3. 13.
07Which pays a better dividend — HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE?
In this comparison, FCEL (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. HYLN, PLUG, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HYLN or FCEL or PLUG or BE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+934.
6% 10Y return). Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +934. 6%, HYLN: -74. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HYLN and FCEL and PLUG and BE?
These companies operate in different sectors (HYLN (Consumer Cyclical) and FCEL (Industrials) and PLUG (Industrials) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HYLN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FCEL pays a dividend while HYLN, PLUG, BE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.